Started By
Message
Posted on 2/1/24 at 12:49 am to PerrillouxToTexas
Yes less talent bc DeBoer recruited and developed HS kids that were ranked significantly lower that your team, and as HS kids, were significantly less athletic (aka why they were ranked low). Hence, DeBoer gets credit for developing less talented kids into NFL prospects, while Sark recruited and had a team of (based on recruiting sites we all follow), NFL prospects out of HS. Sark having less players drafted that DeBoer doesn’t prove he had more talent, it says he was out coached. Logic would dictate DeBoer can win more games that Sark with equal talent, if you’re being honest.
I get you guys watch football, but if football was an onion, you guys only watch and talk the first layer. But forget everything I just said. This site is to troll and talk shite everyday and get offended, not talk football like adults.
I get you guys watch football, but if football was an onion, you guys only watch and talk the first layer. But forget everything I just said. This site is to troll and talk shite everyday and get offended, not talk football like adults.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 1:37 am to PerrillouxToTexas
quote:
Less talent?
3, 5, 15 and 8
Texas recruiting class rankings the past 4 years.
Ill let you do Washington who had classes in the 50s
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 1:38 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News