Started By
Message

re: Is Michigan a better job than LSU?

Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by Tigahtildeath
Member since Aug 2017
559 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:37 pm to
UM has larger stadium, larger athletic budget, a $17b endowment, larger alumni base, positioned in an area with much higher population base.

I would say it is better than all SEC schools…except Texas. Just needs the right coach.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 12:40 pm
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3372 posts
Posted on 1/24/24 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

UM has larger stadium


How does having a slightly larger stadium make the job better?

107K compared to 102K

quote:

larger athletic budget


They're both around 200 million, the difference is negligible.

quote:

a $17b endowment


Has nothing to do with nor impacts athletic departments.

quote:

larger alumni base


I'll give yo this one, size of alumni base matters.

quote:

positioned in an area with much higher population base


Approximately double the population and land size of Louisiana, shares state with another Big 10 school. Not as talent rich. I don't see this as an advantage. Moreover, Michigan would not rank top three in population amongst SEC states.

Notwithstanding alumni base, your points as to why the job is better than LSU and/or other SEC schools are without merit.

Otherwise, Texas A&M would be considered the best job in the country, surely better than Michigan based on your qualifications.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter