Started By
Message

re: Transfers should have a 1 year ban on nil deals like old transfer rules

Posted on 1/16/24 at 10:30 am to
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
24234 posts
Posted on 1/16/24 at 10:30 am to
quote:

And following up, the reason the pro teams don’t become free agents at the end of the season is that they have agreed to things that prevent that in collective bargaining in which the players and teams both had a voice.


This is the difference. Because the people at the top don't want to give a cut, there's are no proper contracts. And without a contract, both parties are vulnerable and can get fricked.

I know a guy who played for South Carolina in the early eighties. That is until he fricked his knee up, and they revoked his scholarship.

You don't see that often anymore with injuries. But it probably still happens at smaller schools. Getting crucified in the media is the only reason they wouldn't do it.
Posted by InkStainedWretch
Member since Dec 2018
1851 posts
Posted on 1/16/24 at 10:45 am to
That’s why I liked the guy’s idea who said let ‘em earn what they want, but make a scholarship a binding contract between the school and the player for 3 years. That IMO is fair and cognizant of today’s realities.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter