Started By
Message

re: Transfers should have a 1 year ban on nil deals like old transfer rules

Posted on 1/15/24 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20834 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 12:35 pm to
The NCAA just did an absolutely horrible job of getting out in front of this. There was a reason they restricted NIL before and it was because of everything we see now. It wasn’t about preventing players from making money from jersey sales. Maybe they thought they could win in court and keep on with the way it was, but they should’ve rolled out a plan before it ever got to the SC.

Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52880 posts
Posted on 1/15/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

The NCAA just did an absolutely horrible job of getting out in front of this. There was a reason they restricted NIL before and it was because of everything we see now. It wasn’t about preventing players from making money from jersey sales. Maybe they thought they could win in court and keep on with the way it was, but they should’ve rolled out a plan before it ever got to the SC.



Likely because the NCAA wasn't used to doing that much work. They are lazy. Like you said, they should have a plan ready to go, but they aren't used to doing too much besides handing out bullshite infractions and penalties.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter