Started By
Message

re: If Milroe was the reason………

Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:20 am to
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

I'm in the Rees and Milroe both weren't good camp, but Rees is the one paid to make adjustments and figure out a way to use the skillset of the players he has and he did not do that... at all.


His adjustment should have been either find a way to develop another QB which he had not been here long enough to do that or just run the ball with the QB we had.

I would have rather seen Milroe under center handing it off as quickly as possible.

In the end Rees may not be the answer and yes it was frustrating that instead of having a solid game plan going into the game it seemed we had to rely on half time adjustments to pull out a win the majority of games this season. But Milroe is definitely not the answer and I do not think whoever the OC was could have helped with Milroe at QB.

I hope I am wrong because Milroe at this point will be the starter going into next season. The only way we have a chance to win is with a very dedicated plan that tries to limit the weaknesses of Milroe.
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 8:52 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter