Started By
Message
re: If you think (or know) SEC officials are bad/corrupt the Cowboys Lions game is 4 u
Posted on 12/31/23 at 1:38 am to dbuchanon
Posted on 12/31/23 at 1:38 am to dbuchanon
He was still covered by another receiver and I don’t think you can be declared as an eligible receiver regardless in that case.
At least that is my view of it and the way I have always understood it.
Great execution on the call but that would have been why Dallas didn’t cover the guy because they knew he was not an eligible receiver.
At least that is my view of it and the way I have always understood it.
Great execution on the call but that would have been why Dallas didn’t cover the guy because they knew he was not an eligible receiver.
Posted on 12/31/23 at 2:43 am to Godawgs4
quote:
He was still covered by another receiver and I don’t think you can be declared as an eligible receiver regardless in that case.
He was not. I thought the same thing at first glance, but it was due to the angle. It was close, but t
quote:
Great execution on the call but that would have been why Dallas didn’t cover the guy because they knew he was not an eligible receiver.
[quote]Great execution on the call but that would have been why Dallas didn’t cover the guy because they knew he was not an eligible receiver.
Regardless of how the frick up happened, this could indeed be the case. Two lineman were near the ref pre-snap and one of them reports as eligible (the ref claims it was #70). In the replay, the ref steps up to the LOS before the snap and tells them #70 was reporting as eligible.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News