Started By
Message
re: Aggies: was it worth it?
Posted on 12/8/23 at 4:03 pm to BigB123
Posted on 12/8/23 at 4:03 pm to BigB123
The fact is that we will use the portal a lot more. Less risk involved to do so ... I think you see A&M drop back into the teens with the incoming recruiting class, and more focus on proven players out of the portal.
Kiffin has done pretty well with that approach. I think Elko will do the same since we basically hired a GM and brought over the entire recruiting staff from Duke.
Kiffin has done pretty well with that approach. I think Elko will do the same since we basically hired a GM and brought over the entire recruiting staff from Duke.
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 12/10/23 at 11:47 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
The fact is that we will use the portal a lot more. Less risk involved to do so ... I think you see A&M drop back into the teens with the incoming recruiting class, and more focus on proven players out of the portal.
Kiffin has done pretty well with that approach. I think Elko will do the same since we basically hired a GM and brought over the entire recruiting staff from Duke.
Duke didn't really dip in the portal much, they took 8 players in Elko's first year and 9 last year.
Kiffin took 23 last year alone.
I see a lot of misconceptions related to the portal from Aggies lately, mostly that they're going to get a ton of "proven players" there, it just doesn't work like that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News