Started By
Message

re: We banned Scoper for being critical of Pearl?

Posted on 11/9/23 at 12:50 am to
Posted by CorchJay
Member since Nov 2018
16697 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 12:50 am to
I’m not for banning anyone. Obviously everyone knows the basics of the board rules.

I can understand a timeout for someone that spams the same useless information. I can understand the time out by Rig last night. No one wanted to wade through someone spamming about how shitty a coach Bruce is during the game thread. Obvious troll was obvious.

We are all assholes here. If you aren’t you probably shouldn’t be on this board.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105503 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 5:57 am to
Here’s my .02 worth. I’ve been here since this board has been open. Scope and his alter, which I only learned yesterday was also banned, are the only two I now know of that were banned. There could be a couple of more but I am not sure. There really hasn’t even been that many warnings given. In fact, I have seen more complaints both serious and fun, calling out the mods here for not doing a better job policing the board.

So we are going to hold an inquisition when one poster is given a timeout just from our board? We’re going to throw around righteous indignation as if our board is turning into Auburn Eagle or AUFamily? I think Rig, Ross, LCT, have shown tremendous restraint and responsibility all these years with the authority they have over the board. If Rig made a choice to give a poster a short timeout, I’m not going to worry about it as if he is being reckless or dictator like. It’s a very rare occurrence so it just doesn’t seem like an issue to get all bothered about, but that’s just my opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter