Started By
Message

re: Refs/bias

Posted on 10/25/23 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
8906 posts
Posted on 10/25/23 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

It’s just Alabama, isn’t it. Why is that?


If you think fans on this board only complain about the refs in games against Alabama then your glasses are such a deep shade of puke orange that you probably can't read this sentence anyway.

But you're still dodging my initial question. If the refs are actively favoring Alabama to win, then why do calls like the PI on the interception in last year's TSIO still happen? And just saying, "Oh, the refs decided to call that anyway but they still mostly favor Alabama" is a copout and won't be allowed. They literally took the game away from Alabama and made it possible for Tennessee to still win, all on a judgment call that could have easily not been thrown. Why would they do that if their motive is to make Alabama win games?
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
4469 posts
Posted on 10/25/23 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Why would they do that if their motive is to make Alabama win games?


Because making sure Bama wins at all cost isn’t their sole motive if Alabama won every game through overwhelming shady calls then the SEC would cease to be. Teams would leave. No one is saying all calls will always go Bama’s way

But to say that everyone else is wrong and Bama doesn’t get favoritism from the refs is laughable at this point. Every other fanbase isn’t wrong. And they all say the same thing about Bama (and only Bama). And you can’t address that, can you?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter