Started By
Message
re: Locked On Auburn
Posted on 10/6/23 at 7:44 am to Weagle25
Posted on 10/6/23 at 7:44 am to Weagle25
You are the weasel that defended a welch for there being no integrity online and you want me to listen to you. Stop
I heard plenty in the first five minutes to hear that portion.
And I am not arguing.
Crain's argument that he led with is we couldve done more to stop Bowers. And Crain said like ten times "THE WHOLE DEBATE IS ABOUT THE SCHEME." Do we really care about the person's opinion that doesnt know schemes if that is the debate?
If anything Charlie sounds like a typical fan with typical open ended statements "why do we keep running it up the middle" and Crain is probably right since he is the only one not using fan generalizations but he is full of himself.
I heard plenty in the first five minutes to hear that portion.
And I am not arguing.
Crain's argument that he led with is we couldve done more to stop Bowers. And Crain said like ten times "THE WHOLE DEBATE IS ABOUT THE SCHEME." Do we really care about the person's opinion that doesnt know schemes if that is the debate?
If anything Charlie sounds like a typical fan with typical open ended statements "why do we keep running it up the middle" and Crain is probably right since he is the only one not using fan generalizations but he is full of himself.
This post was edited on 10/6/23 at 8:24 am
2
Posted on 10/6/23 at 8:41 am to jangalang
I don't think Charlie tried to debate that he knows football more than Jake, he was trying to say that his specific point about coverage was bad. Jake went super Saiyan and destroyed Charlie which is more than fair when you infer that a guy isn't smart, but damn. lol None of us know more football xo's than tubbs, Malzhan, chizik, or even Harsin, but we've all voiced our displeasure with their decisions in certain situations.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 9:40 am to jangalang
quote:
You are the weasel that defended a welch for there being no integrity online and you want me to listen to you. Stop
Lol like this has any relevance to anything
quote:
And I am not arguing.
“I’m not arguing” then goes on and argues. You don’t know the points being made by each.
quote:
Do we really care about the person's opinion that doesnt know schemes if that is the debate?
If he doesn’t know shite about scheme, then obliterate his argument with your knowledge of scheme. Don’t sit here and make him prove his credentials on knowing scheme before then arguing his specific points.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News