Started By
Message

re: Sam Horn

Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:09 am to
Posted by JBlutarsky
Member since Mar 2016
361 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:09 am to
And he missed the wide open receiver downfield which would have been an easy 70 yard touchdown.

He locked onto the receiver.

He threw it behind him.

He blew that play.
Posted by Tackle74
Columbia, MO
Member since Mar 2012
5264 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 10:35 am to
"And he missed the wide open receiver downfield which would have been an easy 70 yard touchdown.

He locked onto the receiver.

He threw it behind him.

He blew that play."

Watched the endzone of that multiple times it was a flood right roll out. The deep reciever was the correct route to hit, the flat was covered and the middle route was open. He threw it behind the middle reciever who still should have made the catch (it hit his hands you make the damn catch). His read was not "wrong" his read was not optimal. Since we are castigating him for making the sub optimal read and throw are we doing the same on Cook. He threw twice into double coverage and one extreemly late and high to Wease on a 4rd odwn, which lkead to Meavis; 1st miss. Now do I think Horn should start over Cook? I cannot say that as I am not in practice or QB rooom everyday. Cook obviously has a better grasp of the offense and has the support of the team. He does though lack the arm talent of a top notch SEC QB, that I can see. I am also worried that no mater who walks through the door Drink will stay with Cook another 2 more years. The fact that a QB with his limitations is set to be a 4 year starter should be a problem to any Tiger fan.
This post was edited on 9/7/23 at 10:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter