re: Is there a consensus #2 football program in the SEC, historically?

quote:

---

4 more SEC titles doesn't trump natties and Heismans.

---

1) There isn't some SOP on a converstion chart between the 2. Personally I think 4 more SEC titles is FAR more important than 1 more national title. For many reasons that Iv'e already mentiond earlier.

2) Again you are stuck on heismans. If there was a hypothetical program that had a sub-.500 record all time with zero hardware of any kind but had won 15 heismans, woudl that be one of hte best programs in CFB hsitory? Of course not, it would mean they're a shitty team/program that's happene dot have some elite individuals play for it. Heismans are no different than #1 overall draft picks, it's a nice feather in your cap but it's an individual award handed out by a bunchy of other individuals. You are saying that's equally as important as actual wins on the football field against other temas. Crazy.