Started By
Message
re: Which Expansion was Less of a Fit: Ark/SCAR, Aggie/Mizzou, or OU/TX?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:56 am to PerrillouxToTexas
Posted on 6/1/23 at 11:56 am to PerrillouxToTexas
Ah... ok. Living in the past, based on something that might have been appealing to Shiller back in 1989. I thought you were trying to say the SEC wanted Texass now, not 30+ years ago.
I found this article linked at the bottom of your "proof" that is significantly more relevant to the Texas of today and the transition to the SEC.
"Texas football is a joke" LINK /
I found this article linked at the bottom of your "proof" that is significantly more relevant to the Texas of today and the transition to the SEC.
"Texas football is a joke" LINK /
1
Posted on 6/1/23 at 12:02 pm to ReversePiggie
You left off the rest of the headline: "Texas is a joke... now, but move to SEC will help revive Longhorns"
And if Texas football is a joke, then Arkansas obviously is too. Unfortunately you've had the benefit of being in the SEC for 30 years and are still a joke.
Anyway, past, present, future, doesn't matter. If you're the SEC commissioner putting together a plan for expansion, who's your top choice? It's obviously Texas, no matter if we're in 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020.
You think it's a coincidence that every single expansion the SEC has made just randomly included a Texas rival?
And if Texas football is a joke, then Arkansas obviously is too. Unfortunately you've had the benefit of being in the SEC for 30 years and are still a joke.
Anyway, past, present, future, doesn't matter. If you're the SEC commissioner putting together a plan for expansion, who's your top choice? It's obviously Texas, no matter if we're in 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020.
You think it's a coincidence that every single expansion the SEC has made just randomly included a Texas rival?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News