These lists are arbitrary.
Apply some algorithm and go with the data.
For example

(CWS Appearances + (CWS Title * 2)) * CWS Winning Percentage

Basically a point for making it, 2 points for winning it and that sum multiplied times the winning percentage of your appearances to award those that were most successful in Omaha.

Here's those results for every team with 5 or more appearances:

Southern California
Texas
Arizona State
LSU
Miami (FL)
Arizona
Cal State Fullerton
Stanford
Oklahoma State
South Carolina
Florida State
Oregon State
Minnesota
Oklahoma
Florida
Michigan
Mississippi State
Vanderbilt
California
Wichita State
Missouri
North Carolina
Arkansas
Virginia
Clemson
Rice
Georgia
Ole Miss
UCLA
Southern Illinois
Alabama
TCU
Western Michigan
Maine
Penn State
Tennessee
St. John's (NY)
Auburn
Louisville
Northern Colorado
Connecticut
Texas A&M

This post was edited on 2/1/23 at 7:53 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by rtr23242526

Member since Dec 2022

1856 posts

Posted on 2/1/23 at 9:03 am to MStateDawg

decade is 10 yrs bedwetter...90s is a decade ..00-02 not so much..lsu too short of a dominant span to be best all time..best of 90s u betcha..boom

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TxWampus

Member since Oct 2021

201 posts

Posted on 2/1/23 at 9:17 am to MStateDawg

Not a bad way to do it... though I wonder if we should use CWS tournament games win % as the appropriate metric... Some people had easier roads to the CWS. What if you used Championship efficiency as your aggregate? Just curious...

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board