quote:
First off, playing college sports isn’t a job. Secondly, the players are already being well compensated with a scholarship, room, food and stipend.

Seems to me that a major court case and the current paradigm disagree with your quaint antiquated view.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Revelator

Member since Nov 2008

59501 posts

Posted on 1/12/23 at 2:53 pm to Mo Jeaux

quote:
Seems to me that a major court case and the current paradigm disagree with your quaint antiquated view.

I’m sure my view are antiquated, because I’m antiquated.
As far as the courts saying a person should be paid for his/her NIL, it was never designed to be a mechanism to buy players.

This post was edited on 1/12/23 at 2:57 pm

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by LCTFAN

New Iberia

Member since Mar 2013

2766 posts

Posted on 1/12/23 at 3:48 pm to Mo Jeaux

Mo Jeaux

quote:
Seems to me that a major court case and the current paradigm disagree with your quaint antiquated view.

Opting out, nothing anyone can do about this other than cancel the financial aid

Making transfers sit out a whole year would encourage kids to stay at one school. This may be legal and not sure.

Moving from school to school does not promote the student athlete part of the equation.

NIL is here and here to stay, the richer alumni will buy players

I understand your passion accepting NIL but there are the hard-core College fans that want to see a recruit sign and stay 4 years, develop and love for lifetime, understand them.

There is always the option to turn the tv off and enjoy life another way.

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board