Started By
Message

re: I was against more than 4 team playoff...

Posted on 1/1/23 at 1:19 pm to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59008 posts
Posted on 1/1/23 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

My optimal playoff was a 6 teamer with the top two seeds getting a bye” to reward them. I think 6 is plenty and is demonstrably plenty most years. This year would have had Alabama and Tennessee in, as it appears should be warranted, and the two undefeated teams would have received byes. You also stand a good chance at getting most the conferences in with a rep and don’t water things down too much at 6.


Problem with your logic. They have already demonstrated that with an expanded playoff they would want to put the P5 champions and 1 G5 team, so Alabama and Tennessee would still not make a 6 team playoff.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20287 posts
Posted on 1/1/23 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Problem with your logic. They have already demonstrated that with an expanded playoff they would want to put the P5 champions and 1 G5 team, so Alabama and Tennessee would still not make a 6 team playoff.


Not always…I said there was an improved opportunity to have more conferences represented BUT if the goal remains the same, to get the 6 best teams in, then a shitty conference “champ” would still be s.o.l.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter