Started By
Message

re: The NIL Ruling has nothing to do with the portal. The SCOTUS did not rule on the Portal.

Posted on 12/8/22 at 3:16 pm to
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
7623 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

college athletes in which they say that they should be qualified as employees


If this happens, could an employment contract then have a Non-compete clause worked in it that would prevent or penalize an athlete from going to another school?
Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
23277 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

If this happens, could an employment contract then have a Non-compete clause worked in it that would prevent or penalize an athlete from going to another school?

I don't know, I assume they would essentially be State employees.

Which IMO implies that they are eligible for benefits like retirement or a pension, health insurance, etc.

In this scenario, you could have a 5th-year senior who graduates with a masters degree, works for five years in the same system, and is fully vested (thus completing 10 years of service).

And we're talking about athletes across all collegiate sports, not just football.

How anyone could possibly think we could all pay for this down the road is a mystery, hence why I said it would probably end college sports as we know it.
Posted by ALhunter
Member since Dec 2018
2967 posts
Posted on 12/8/22 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

have a Non-compete clause
Look above at the posts by me and NaturalStateReb above... the answer is probably no.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter