Started By
Message

re: The NCAA lost in the highest court in the land

Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:09 am to
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25895 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:

NCAA had 20 to 40 years to add arrows to their quiver for student athletes but they just fattened their executive salaries and perks and put their head in the sand.



You are confused, man.
The NCAA doesn't fatten their wallets on college football. Basketball, yes.
But those numbers pale in comparison to what the conferences/universities bring in.

If you are making the "fat cat" argument, you are looking the wrong direction.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54973 posts
Posted on 12/7/22 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

You are confused, man


No

quote:

The NCAA doesn't fatten their wallets on college football


in the 50's, 60's and 70's they did till the CFA formed and SCOTUS ruled

quote:

Basketball, yes.


The Final Four is 1.1 Billion a year (yes Billion with a B) to NCAA's income

quote:

If you are making the "fat cat" argument, you are looking the wrong direction.


Still the correct argument. They did the "fat cat" thing till they lost it. Instead of learning from this error they have continued to make the same mistake with basketball.

In football the NCAA has just been replaced by the BCS / CFP which is currently a LLC (closely held private for profit?)

quote:

The BCS bowls had been accused of promoting the BCS system because they and their executive officers greatly benefited financially from the system. Bowl executives, such as John Junker of the Fiesta Bowl, were often paid unusually high salaries for employees of non-profit organizations. To promote support for their bowls and the BCS system, these highly paid executives allegedly gave lavish gifts to politicians, collegiate sports executives, and university athletic directors.

In response, a pro-playoff organization, called Playoff PAC, in September 2010 filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service. The complaint alleged that the top BCS bowls, with the exception of the Rose Bowl, routinely abused favorable tax status by using charitable donations to give gifts and compensation to college athletic officials. In one example detailed in the complaint, the Orange Bowl treated its executive staff and invited college athletic directors to a four-day Royal Caribbean cruise in which no business meetings were held
.



New Boss, same as the Old Boss

If a private company now controls access to all the games ...

a) It is a monopoly
b) It controls the seating (and can sell to corporations before schools)
c) it controls the revenue streams, not the schools
d) it could care lees about actual fans and focuses more on revenue
e) all of the above and then some.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter