Started By
Message

re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama?

Posted on 11/9/22 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by Mac
Forked Island, USA
Member since Nov 2007
14664 posts
Posted on 11/9/22 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

If the officials thought LSU really had possession prior to the oob touch, they would have awarded to LSU. No single frame photo would show different either. Was what it was.



Reasonable minds can differ on whether he had possession when the Bama player touched the ball, they called it a fumble/recovery on the field. How can you say there is indisputable evidence that the LSU player didn't have possession??
Posted by ceretonia
Dallas
Member since Nov 2014
727 posts
Posted on 11/9/22 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

How can you say there is indisputable evidence that the LSU player didn't have possession??


As I just stated in response to another post. On the field, it was ruled that: Brooks had established possession of the ball at 1:17 seconds (end of play).

So you’re looking at it wrong. The replay official would be required to find indisputable evidence that it was clearly possessed prior to being hit since that was not the ruling on the field.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter