Favorite team:TCU 
Location:Dallas
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:673
Registered on:11/7/2014
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
re: Member a few months ago when Bama thought it was going to the playoffs - ceretonia
[quote]A lot of them still thought they were getting in this morning. [/quote] They were trolling probably. Don’t think ANY reasonable person thought this....
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Not to derail, but LSU is beating Georgia this week - ceretonia
[quote]Georgia is 10X better than the state of Louisiana.[/quote] Going to have to stop you right there. Georgia has managed to find a way to suck even worse than Mississippi in recent years. Most embarrassing state in the south by far!...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: Did the NIL kill Bama football? - ceretonia
[quote]And we're still gonna go 10-2 with 2 road losses on the last play of the game to good teams. I guess that means we died? I dunno. [/quote] People are so damn dramatic these days. Especially here....
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Did the NIL kill Bama football? - ceretonia
[quote]A few plays here and there and Bama could've lost to Texas and Ole Miss too.[/quote] The same could be said about us. Auburn, Bama, and Arkansas were toss ups. We needed a fourth quarter comeback against MS state and Florida game wasn’t secured until well into 4th quarter. Could easil...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Bill was "spot on" w his replay review analysis - ceretonia
[quote]Where does the rulebook explain one of these being an immediate recovery and one not? [/quote] 2018: Possession presnap; Aggies. Person w/knee down: OFFENSE, BALL CARRIER. Last Saturday: Possession presnap: Bama Person w/knee down: DEFENDER. Free to debate the call but there a...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Bill was "spot on" w his replay review analysis - ceretonia
[quote]On the first play he overruled the call on the field even though I didn’t see conclusive evidence that our guy didn’t gain possession of the ball before the oob Bama player retouched it. [/quote] On the field, it was ruled that: Brooks had established possession of the ball at 1:17 seconds...
Posted on Tiger Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
[quote]Lsu guy clearly had possession even Herbstreit and Fowler said so. Nice try.[/quote] They thought it was recovered with 1:20 left in half. The ruling on the field was it was recovered with 1:17 left. There would have to be irrefutable evidence it was recovered before 1:17. Replay off...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
2018: Possession presnap; Aggies. Person w/knee down: OFFENSE, BALL CARRIER. Last Saturday: Possession presnap: Bama Person w/knee down: DEFENDER. Free to debate the call but there are some significant differences. Impetus becomes a factor too. [img]https://i.ibb.co/7bVhNTr/9-B6-F9-...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
[quote]How can you say there is indisputable evidence that the LSU player didn't have possession??[/quote] As I just stated in response to another post. On the field, it was ruled that: Brooks had established possession of the ball at 1:17 seconds (end of play). So you’re looking at it wrong....
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
[quote]So to overturn that they had to find conclusive evidence the LSU player did not possess the ball before the out of bounds Alabama player touched it[/quote] You’re mistaken here. What was the COMPLETE call? On the field, it was ruled that: Brooks had established possession of the ball at ...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
[quote] Having both hands on something means you posessess it. The fumbling team should never benefit from this.[/quote] By rule a ball must be “firmly grasped” to he possessed. But that is irrelevant, because the ruling on the field was that he did not possess it at that time. That happened ar...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
[quote]Main reason Kelly went for two was of a real concern the refs would continue to favor the gumps ![/quote] I haven’t seen any evidence of this....
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: Can we talk about the 1H fumble situation in LSU-Bama? - ceretonia
[quote]I do not care about the rule. I knew the rule beforehand. I want it explained how he had evidence to overturn the call on the field. Only way you get 100% confirmation on anything I seen is all people favoring one team. Sometimes we try to get too perfect with review. If it is not obvious it ...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]But what, exactly, does that mean? It’s subjective. And I think that’s exactly what the OP is trying to illustrate.[/quote] But there is criteria that we are trained to look at. Completing a football action is one here (he’s attempting to pull ball to chest), adequate security time (> 1 sec...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]So by overturning the call on the field the replay official is saying LSU player without a doubt did not have a firm grasp of the ball. I disagree.[/quote] Look, you’re retarded. I tried explaining it to you but you’re too retarded and biased to try to understand. I can’t fix retarded her...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (1)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]How can you “swat away” something from somebody that doesn’t have it. You would simply be swatting it. The term away in your argument is evidence that the recovering player has it.[/quote] Again FIRM GRASP. He’s attempting to grasp it but hadn’t met the condition required for possession....
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]Can you be bringing something to your chest that you don’t have a grasp of?[/quote] FIRM GRASP is the definition....
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (2)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]Not how it works chief. The call on the field was possession lsu.[/quote] It is how it works in terms of possession, sir. You’re misinterpreting what you hear people on television. If I pointed a gun to your head, could you clearly say he had a FIRM GRASP on the ball based on what you see?...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (2)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]So clear possession for mond was the millisecond his hand touched the top of the ball, because they called him down and the only time both his knee was on the ground and contact with the ball was the split second when he first touched the ball [/quote] The Mond is more iffy to me. But CUSTO...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (0)
re: When does possession start on a fumble recovery? Mond vs Brooks and SEC refs - ceretonia
[quote]To say you have to have the ball secured and brought to your chest is absolutely wrong.[/quote] I didn’t say that. But Brooks is attempting to do so here to complete possession. What you are failing to see is that CUSTODY belongs to the offense and latu here. If there isn’t CLEAR eviden...
Posted on SEC Rant
Jump to Post - View Topic - Replies (2)