Started By
Message
re: Is the Big Ten a sleeping giant?
Posted on 8/24/22 at 6:59 pm to MillerLiteTime
Posted on 8/24/22 at 6:59 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
But here is the interesting part. Despite SEC dominance on the field for 2 decades now, the B10 has gotten a better tv rights deal every time throughout those 20 years.
They flip over which one has the better money deal, however the SEC averages 3 NC every decade since the 1950's (so the SEC has been dominate for longer than 2 decades). The only decade the SEC did not win 3 NC during a decade was in the 1980's.
The Big Ten has won 3 NC since 1970. While they have gotten a good deal for now, remember that the SEC will be renegotiating because it added new members.
The SEC is so far ahead of the Big Ten in athletics they need a telescope to see us.
Posted on 8/24/22 at 8:05 pm to TideFaninFl
quote:
While they have gotten a good deal for now, remember that the SEC will be renegotiating because it added new members.
Nope. Another area where we got owned in negotiating tv rights. All we are getting is a pro rata addition. In other words Disney will pay the SEC the same amount to add Texas as it is currently paying us for Vanderbilt.
We literally added the most valuable tv rights university in the nation, plus Oklahoma, and all we get is a pro rata bonus to break even. Sankey got owned in this round just like how Slive got dominated by the joke of a CBS contract we are currently locked into.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)