Started By
Message
re: 1-7 scheduling model gaining momentum per SI’s Ross Dellinger
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:59 am to Kingcmo
Posted on 6/6/22 at 11:59 am to Kingcmo
quote:
I don’t know why it has to be 7-1 or 6-3. Just agree on total conference games and then lock in some rivalry games, let the rest of the schedule rotate. If Uga has two permanent games but Missouri only has 1 or 3 who GAF. They’ll still all play pretty often.
That'd be nice, seriously, but will never happen because people will want the same balance for everyone. I'd be all for earmarking certain games and then figuring out the rest, but some teams would have more rotating games than others so I'm not even sure how you'd set a system like that up. Especially for the expansion teams that don't have history with other conference members like the founding members do
This post was edited on 6/6/22 at 12:01 pm
1
Posted on 6/6/22 at 12:03 pm to lsufball19
quote:
That'd be nice, seriously, but will never happen because people will want the same balance for everyone. I'd be all for earmarking certain games and then figuring out the rest, but some teams would have more rotating games than others so I'm not even sure how you'd set a system like that up. Especially for the expansion teams that don't have history with other conference members like the founding members do
If this was the case, Vandy would have the toughest schedule in the country every season.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News