Started By
Message
re: If the SEC goes to the 3-6 scheduling option, which 3 permanent opponents should we face?
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:50 am to EZE Tiger Fan
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:50 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Is a Bama alum still in charge of this? If so, you don't want this. LSU, Auburn, UF, and UGA would all get the short end while Bama would get the easiest schedule, and it wouldn't be close.
You guys aren’t keeping up. Dellenger had the article this morning. Every “Big 8” team would play two Big 8 permanents and one “Little 8” permanent. The little guys get two of each other and one Big Boy.
In the current model, Tennessee is a Little 8 (A&M has their place with the Big Big Boys) so Bama’s permanents would be Auburn, LSU, and Tennessee.
1
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:40 pm to Choupique19
quote:
You guys aren’t keeping up. Dellenger had the article this morning. Every “Big 8” team would play two Big 8 permanents and one “Little 8” permanent. The little guys get two of each other and one Big Boy. In the current model, Tennessee is a Little 8 (A&M has their place with the Big Big Boys) so Bama’s permanents would be Auburn, LSU, and Tennessee.
I don't doubt you or what the article says. I just remember when the bridge scheduling happened years ago, we were told one thing, then the next thing we knew games were getting moved BETWEEN seasons to benefit Bama.
Most blatant example was LSU being moved to play AT UGA in 2013 instead of our rotation to be AT UK. This after Bama barely beat UGA in the 2012 SECCG.
Anyone who pays attention knows they will rig everything to favor Bama. What's on paper now is meaningless.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News