Started By
Message

re: As the Bonfire Burns™

Posted on 5/11/22 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

This is absolutely a fair question. The answer is that the NCAA doesn’t have the resources to pursue everyone, so more likely they will look to make an example of one or two programs as a warning to everyone else. A&M is at the top of that list because you’ve flaunted the situation way more than others and you’re also not a traditional power.

I will also grant you it’s at least as likely that nothing comes of this.

If that be the case, the NCAA is better served going after a much less funded program they can beat up on. Do you really think a program like A&M who has been down this road a million times with the NCAA and Charles Allen Wright is going to just sit back and take it?

This will be in litigation until the end of time.
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
17504 posts
Posted on 5/11/22 at 12:47 pm to
If the NCAA tried to sanction A&M for allowing boosters to be involved in collectives that enter into NIL deals with players while ignoring the dozens of other programs that are doing the same thing (and in many cases even publicizing it), A&M will fight like holy hell. There would be litigation. Discovery would be a blast. No chance in hell that happens.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter