re: 24/7 Sports Grades New Coaching Staffs

quote:

---

So is keeping Mullen's staff bad because they were unsuccessful or good because they have SEC experience?

---

That’s the big question. Or the point I’m trying to make really in that long arse novel. Is it better to have a staff full of guys with “SEC experience”, despite that experience being what some would deem a failure; or a staff full of Sun-Belt g5 guys who had a pretty good amount of success in a lower tier level of competition…? I mean everyone will have different answers and opinions about what they would rather and what is a better staff…
But either way, just the fact that a question like that can be asked or brought up, should be enough “proof” that an A+ grade is biased and/or unwarranted.
Imo, if/when I’m grading something, for me to give that “+” after an “A” grade, means to me that every reason presented is unquestionable and there is nothing that can be brought up that could create doubt.