Started By
Message
re: 24/7 Sports Grades New Coaching Staffs
Posted on 1/25/22 at 1:57 pm to Chad 23
Posted on 1/25/22 at 1:57 pm to Chad 23
quote:
What do you mean, they hired Mike Denbrock as their offensive coordinator
Giving Napier an A+ is crazy… his off field staff is pretty much just a bunch of dudes that came from ULL with him. And for the spots that he didn’t fill with g5 coaches like S&C or “nutrition” or whatever, he just kept the same guys that were already there at UF. And we all know how successful they were…. So how is this new off field staff an improvement from Mullen’s staff? He could’ve/should’ve just kept everyone from Mullen’s staff since they had SEC experience. Going from P5/Sec guys to G5 guys is considered as an A+ improvement? I guess the made up roles, like “game changer coordinator” or whatever is what makes it an A+, idk? Also I apologize, I’ve been saying G5 “guys” the whole time, but it’s not all dudes, a few of his hires were female…
And looking at his on-field staff, one of his key hires came from a team that everyone on here has been bashing and making fun of for the last 2 years. Orgeron was a shrimp boat captain, incompetent coach incapable of running a program, yet when Florida hires away one of the most integral coaches from that “incompetent” guys staff, it is somehow seen as A+ quality hire???
So either this grading shite is arse backwards, or UF fans are becoming more delusional than tOSU fans…
Posted on 1/25/22 at 2:02 pm to SaDub225
quote:
He could’ve/should’ve just kept everyone from Mullen’s staff since they had SEC experience.
Stopped reading right about here lmao
Posted on 1/25/22 at 2:03 pm to SaDub225
quote:
And for the spots that he didn’t fill with g5 coaches like S&C or “nutrition” or whatever, he just kept the same guys that were already there at UF.
Stopped reading after this because you don’t know wtf you’re talking about.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 2:57 pm to SaDub225
quote:
SaDub225
In back-to-back sentences you say:
quote:
he just kept the same guys that were already there at UF. And we all know how successful they were….
And then you say:
quote:
. So how is this new off field staff an improvement from Mullen’s staff? He could’ve/should’ve just kept everyone from Mullen’s staff since they had SEC experience.
So is keeping Mullen's staff bad because they were unsuccessful or good because they have SEC experience?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)