ChiGator
| Favorite team: | Florida |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Riling up the Poli Board |
| Number of Posts: | 4014 |
| Registered on: | 11/28/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Yeah trust me, I don’t give a shite about the guy or 90% of his talking points but he was all over the oil tanker issue during the start of Covid. Him and Kuppy know what they’re talking about when it comes to global shipping/commodities
re: The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/14/26 at 3:15 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
Oh and FYI, even when leaving out the commodities, we’re spending $1B a day on this war. For a bunch of mouth breathers around here that were jerking off to DOGE 12 months ago, seems like a giant way to ensure the deficit stays out of control.
re: The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/14/26 at 3:13 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
How am I back tracking? What in my original post hasn’t been a serious discussion point both to the global economy and the stock market over the last week? Just because 3/4 of this website gargles Trumps ballsack doesn’t mean this isn’t a significant headwind against his administration currently.
New banner in the Auburn rafters
Posted by ChiGator on 3/13/26 at 10:10 pm

re: The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/10/26 at 4:21 pm to tigersmanager
All I know is this situation is very fluid and nobody really knows anything right now. Trump can tweet as much as he wants to manipulate markets but a certain point the air is going to come out.
Not creating any panic, but understanding bear case scenarios is important. Even in a casino market.
Not creating any panic, but understanding bear case scenarios is important. Even in a casino market.
re: The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/8/26 at 9:08 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Iran’s land against the straight is extremely mountainous terrain. Regionally proxy groups causing chaos against ships is a challenging issue.
re: The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/8/26 at 8:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
You didn’t answer the question. Why would Iran cooperate with GCC when they’re under attack?
re: The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/8/26 at 8:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What incentive does Iran have to listen to the GCC?
Escorting tankers in this situation is a complicated and dangerous situation.
Escorting tankers in this situation is a complicated and dangerous situation.
The economic impact from this war will be devastating
Posted by ChiGator on 3/8/26 at 7:42 pm
Below is a long but detailed info by a guy named Calvin Frodge. He’s a shipping trader and understands the industry quite well. Recommend the read. shite is scary, wonder where the off ramp is for this administration.
“If Trump is going to individually escort tankers through the strait, you're talking about an enormously expensive operation which requires many ships as well as tight air support
Even a single inexpensive aerial or naval drone can cause extensive damage to a tanker worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Protecting these ships requires overkill. The Houthis during the Red Sea conflict were able to dramatically reduce the number of ships sailing through. Unlike the Red Sea conflict, where ships could take the longer route around the South Africa, there are few other paths to exporting oil and petrochemical products from the Persian Gulf.
The US Navy and Air Force attempted to suppress Houthi interference in Red Sea shipping. In the several years that the Red Sea has been partially blocked, throughput has remained at less than half of pre-conflict levels, with many episodes where throughput dropped to near zero. The houthis were able to score direct hits on many ships. US soldiers and assets were also lost. And this was not against Iran, this was against the Houthis, who do not have the indigenous weapons platform production that Iran has. The Houthis were completely dependent on their pre-conflict storage of weapons and whatever Iran could smuggle to them. And yet, even this faction in one of the poorest countries on earth was able to dramatically impact global maritime flows.
The setup with Iran is exponentially more dangerous. Iran doesn't simply need to attack tankers. And the United States doesn't just need to protect tankers. The United States has to protect all of the upstream energy producing assets that fill those tankers as well. They need to protect the pipelines, the refineries, the petrochemical plants, the storage tanks. And these assets need not only be attacked by drones and missiles. They are easily sabotaged with even a simple wrench. A hand grenade or shoulder-fired weapon at close proximity in exactly the right location can take out an entire oil refinery. Not to mention much more vulnerable assets such as gas production. Thousands of miles of desert pipelines can be sabotaged with a tool as simple as a drill, obtainable from any hardware store.
The cost of protecting each cargo coming out of the Persian Gulf may exceed the total value of the cargo. Not to mention that it puts US ships directly within close proximity of Iranian weapons that can destroy them. The US largely abandoned this escort strategy during the Red Sea conflict. In fact, an entire coalition of US and European naval forces along with Gulf States attempted this against the houthis. The campaign was an utter failure and the ultimate conclusion from US military leadership was that it was much better risk reward to focus on suppressing strike capability. Yet after months of airstrikes Red Sea traffic never fully returned. Attacks continued.
The Trump administration has expressed its intent in not only protecting these cargos but also in artificially manipulating their prices lower. Trump is working against the laws of physics, sound military doctrine, and fundamental economics.
This entire adventure was poorly thought out and calls the entire Islamic world to jihad against America. Trump's attempts to protect the Persian Gulf will result in failure.”
“If Trump is going to individually escort tankers through the strait, you're talking about an enormously expensive operation which requires many ships as well as tight air support
Even a single inexpensive aerial or naval drone can cause extensive damage to a tanker worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Protecting these ships requires overkill. The Houthis during the Red Sea conflict were able to dramatically reduce the number of ships sailing through. Unlike the Red Sea conflict, where ships could take the longer route around the South Africa, there are few other paths to exporting oil and petrochemical products from the Persian Gulf.
The US Navy and Air Force attempted to suppress Houthi interference in Red Sea shipping. In the several years that the Red Sea has been partially blocked, throughput has remained at less than half of pre-conflict levels, with many episodes where throughput dropped to near zero. The houthis were able to score direct hits on many ships. US soldiers and assets were also lost. And this was not against Iran, this was against the Houthis, who do not have the indigenous weapons platform production that Iran has. The Houthis were completely dependent on their pre-conflict storage of weapons and whatever Iran could smuggle to them. And yet, even this faction in one of the poorest countries on earth was able to dramatically impact global maritime flows.
The setup with Iran is exponentially more dangerous. Iran doesn't simply need to attack tankers. And the United States doesn't just need to protect tankers. The United States has to protect all of the upstream energy producing assets that fill those tankers as well. They need to protect the pipelines, the refineries, the petrochemical plants, the storage tanks. And these assets need not only be attacked by drones and missiles. They are easily sabotaged with even a simple wrench. A hand grenade or shoulder-fired weapon at close proximity in exactly the right location can take out an entire oil refinery. Not to mention much more vulnerable assets such as gas production. Thousands of miles of desert pipelines can be sabotaged with a tool as simple as a drill, obtainable from any hardware store.
The cost of protecting each cargo coming out of the Persian Gulf may exceed the total value of the cargo. Not to mention that it puts US ships directly within close proximity of Iranian weapons that can destroy them. The US largely abandoned this escort strategy during the Red Sea conflict. In fact, an entire coalition of US and European naval forces along with Gulf States attempted this against the houthis. The campaign was an utter failure and the ultimate conclusion from US military leadership was that it was much better risk reward to focus on suppressing strike capability. Yet after months of airstrikes Red Sea traffic never fully returned. Attacks continued.
The Trump administration has expressed its intent in not only protecting these cargos but also in artificially manipulating their prices lower. Trump is working against the laws of physics, sound military doctrine, and fundamental economics.
This entire adventure was poorly thought out and calls the entire Islamic world to jihad against America. Trump's attempts to protect the Persian Gulf will result in failure.”
This is going to be a major problem for Trump and his administration. And there is no easy off ramp.
Below is a long but detailed info by a guy named Calvin Frodge. He’s a shipping trader and understands the industry.
“If Trump is going to individually escort tankers through the strait, you're talking about an enormously expensive operation which requires many ships as well as tight air support
Even a single inexpensive aerial or naval drone can cause extensive damage to a tanker worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Protecting these ships requires overkill. The Houthis during the Red Sea conflict were able to dramatically reduce the number of ships sailing through. Unlike the Red Sea conflict, where ships could take the longer route around the South Africa, there are few other paths to exporting oil and petrochemical products from the Persian Gulf.
The US Navy and Air Force attempted to suppress Houthi interference in Red Sea shipping. In the several years that the Red Sea has been partially blocked, throughput has remained at less than half of pre-conflict levels, with many episodes where throughput dropped to near zero. The houthis were able to score direct hits on many ships. US soldiers and assets were also lost. And this was not against Iran, this was against the Houthis, who do not have the indigenous weapons platform production that Iran has. The Houthis were completely dependent on their pre-conflict storage of weapons and whatever Iran could smuggle to them. And yet, even this faction in one of the poorest countries on earth was able to dramatically impact global maritime flows.
The setup with Iran is exponentially more dangerous. Iran doesn't simply need to attack tankers. And the United States doesn't just need to protect tankers. The United States has to protect all of the upstream energy producing assets that fill those tankers as well. They need to protect the pipelines, the refineries, the petrochemical plants, the storage tanks. And these assets need not only be attacked by drones and missiles. They are easily sabotaged with even a simple wrench. A hand grenade or shoulder-fired weapon at close proximity in exactly the right location can take out an entire oil refinery. Not to mention much more vulnerable assets such as gas production. Thousands of miles of desert pipelines can be sabotaged with a tool as simple as a drill, obtainable from any hardware store.
The cost of protecting each cargo coming out of the Persian Gulf may exceed the total value of the cargo. Not to mention that it puts US ships directly within close proximity of Iranian weapons that can destroy them. The US largely abandoned this escort strategy during the Red Sea conflict. In fact, an entire coalition of US and European naval forces along with Gulf States attempted this against the houthis. The campaign was an utter failure and the ultimate conclusion from US military leadership was that it was much better risk reward to focus on suppressing strike capability. Yet after months of airstrikes Red Sea traffic never fully returned. Attacks continued.
The Trump administration has expressed its intent in not only protecting these cargos but also in artificially manipulating their prices lower. Trump is working against the laws of physics, sound military doctrine, and fundamental economics.
This entire adventure was poorly thought out and calls the entire Islamic world to jihad against America. Trump's attempts to protect the Persian Gulf will result in failure.”
Below is a long but detailed info by a guy named Calvin Frodge. He’s a shipping trader and understands the industry.
“If Trump is going to individually escort tankers through the strait, you're talking about an enormously expensive operation which requires many ships as well as tight air support
Even a single inexpensive aerial or naval drone can cause extensive damage to a tanker worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Protecting these ships requires overkill. The Houthis during the Red Sea conflict were able to dramatically reduce the number of ships sailing through. Unlike the Red Sea conflict, where ships could take the longer route around the South Africa, there are few other paths to exporting oil and petrochemical products from the Persian Gulf.
The US Navy and Air Force attempted to suppress Houthi interference in Red Sea shipping. In the several years that the Red Sea has been partially blocked, throughput has remained at less than half of pre-conflict levels, with many episodes where throughput dropped to near zero. The houthis were able to score direct hits on many ships. US soldiers and assets were also lost. And this was not against Iran, this was against the Houthis, who do not have the indigenous weapons platform production that Iran has. The Houthis were completely dependent on their pre-conflict storage of weapons and whatever Iran could smuggle to them. And yet, even this faction in one of the poorest countries on earth was able to dramatically impact global maritime flows.
The setup with Iran is exponentially more dangerous. Iran doesn't simply need to attack tankers. And the United States doesn't just need to protect tankers. The United States has to protect all of the upstream energy producing assets that fill those tankers as well. They need to protect the pipelines, the refineries, the petrochemical plants, the storage tanks. And these assets need not only be attacked by drones and missiles. They are easily sabotaged with even a simple wrench. A hand grenade or shoulder-fired weapon at close proximity in exactly the right location can take out an entire oil refinery. Not to mention much more vulnerable assets such as gas production. Thousands of miles of desert pipelines can be sabotaged with a tool as simple as a drill, obtainable from any hardware store.
The cost of protecting each cargo coming out of the Persian Gulf may exceed the total value of the cargo. Not to mention that it puts US ships directly within close proximity of Iranian weapons that can destroy them. The US largely abandoned this escort strategy during the Red Sea conflict. In fact, an entire coalition of US and European naval forces along with Gulf States attempted this against the houthis. The campaign was an utter failure and the ultimate conclusion from US military leadership was that it was much better risk reward to focus on suppressing strike capability. Yet after months of airstrikes Red Sea traffic never fully returned. Attacks continued.
The Trump administration has expressed its intent in not only protecting these cargos but also in artificially manipulating their prices lower. Trump is working against the laws of physics, sound military doctrine, and fundamental economics.
This entire adventure was poorly thought out and calls the entire Islamic world to jihad against America. Trump's attempts to protect the Persian Gulf will result in failure.”
re: Saturday SEC Basketball
Posted by ChiGator on 3/7/26 at 4:04 pm to Lynxrufus2012
Florida owns UK. Call us daddy
In recent memory how many non QB trades involving significant draft capital (2+ 1st round picks) actually worked out for the team acquiring the player? Feels like more often than not it does not work. Just so much to give up.
What a start to the year!
Posted by ChiGator on 3/6/26 at 8:11 am
US Economy lost 92K jobs in Feb. Second horrible month in a row
DHS secretary gets fired for stealing $200M & having an affair with a staffer
We’re in a war with Iran. Gas prices going up, global trade will be a mess
Inflation is still a shite show
Epstein files looms over everything
DHS secretary gets fired for stealing $200M & having an affair with a staffer
We’re in a war with Iran. Gas prices going up, global trade will be a mess
Inflation is still a shite show
Epstein files looms over everything
re: 2026 NFL Free Agency: Kyler Murray to the Vikings
Posted by ChiGator on 3/5/26 at 7:36 pm to VermilionTiger
I’d argue DJ is not a field stretcher. He’s a great YAC guy. Total dog with the ball in his hands but not necessarily a burner.
Entire administration is a clown show. Going to get clobbered in the mid-terms. Likely see a Dem president in 2028. GOP had one chance with full power and they puke all over themselves.
re: School logos/brands
Posted by ChiGator on 3/4/26 at 6:50 pm to Arkyologist
OU, UK, and Florida all have iconic logos.
Your pig logo is trash and among the least iconic in the SEC
Your pig logo is trash and among the least iconic in the SEC
A UCONN UF Elite 8 game would feed families
re: I think UF has what it takes to go Back 2 Back (again).
Posted by ChiGator on 3/4/26 at 7:01 am to GatorNation4Lyfe
According to Kenpom Florida has had better defensive efficiency vs last years team. And SOS will likely end up higher after tournament games are included.
re: I think UF has what it takes to go Back 2 Back (again).
Posted by ChiGator on 3/3/26 at 9:27 pm to UltimateHog
Florida is a completely different team. Golden moved Fland off ball and Lee primarily on-ball PG type role. They both have played way better since. Also Brown and Klavzar have become huge off the bench. They did not have established roles back in November.
Popular

3













