Started By
Message
re: SEC is Doing Away With Divisions Completely According to Paul Finebaum
Posted on 12/27/21 at 3:24 pm to TidalSurge1
Posted on 12/27/21 at 3:24 pm to TidalSurge1
quote:
But closer examination reveals that pods actually cause problems instead of being a viable solution for SEC football -- Better solution
As noted on the Alabama board, Alabama, UF, UGa, Auburn, and UT are 5 of the 6 teams that have won SEC titles since divisional play started. Putting them all in the East division would make for a very unbalanced conference and will never happen.
Posted on 12/27/21 at 6:13 pm to C W
TN hasn't won the SEC in this century. AU has only twice. FL hasn't since Urban Meyer left. OK might become better with Venables. TA & TX are both recruiting well and likely to improve. This season, OM won 10 games, TA & AR won 8 & MS won 7. LSU has fallen pretty far, but will likely rebound soon. AL & GA in the SEC-E does make it stronger than the SEC-W initially, but only at the top. Overall, the new E & W will be pretty equal.
New SEC--E: AL, GA, FL, AU, KY, TN, SC, VB
New SEC-W: LS, OK, TX, TA, AR, OM, MS, MO
Factors such as financials, fan interest, brand, facilities, recruiting, coaching & culture will impact teams' future strength more than winning the SEC a decade or more ago will. Those two divisions are much more likely to happen than pods are.
New SEC--E: AL, GA, FL, AU, KY, TN, SC, VB
New SEC-W: LS, OK, TX, TA, AR, OM, MS, MO
Factors such as financials, fan interest, brand, facilities, recruiting, coaching & culture will impact teams' future strength more than winning the SEC a decade or more ago will. Those two divisions are much more likely to happen than pods are.
This post was edited on 1/16/22 at 1:21 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)