Started By
Message
re: #tAuburnBasketball Thread
Posted on 2/1/18 at 1:51 pm to TigerProwl24
Posted on 2/1/18 at 1:51 pm to TigerProwl24
quote:
I also think the chances of Wiley coming back are higher than Purifoy.
I believe the opposite, assuming Purifoy gets the same eligibility decision that Wiley gets
Purifoy has been very hesitant about going overseas. There is a reason why he is still here despite lagging behind Wiley in the process
Posted on 2/1/18 at 2:04 pm to GenesChin
I agree, assuming the same ruling..
I don't want to go into the reasons or details as to why, but I don't think Purifoy will get the same decision as Wiley did. In which case, he'll either transfer or play overseas to get paid, imo. That is why i think Wiley is more likely to return, regardless of the draft decision looming.
quote:
assuming Purifoy gets the same eligibility decision that Wiley gets
I don't want to go into the reasons or details as to why, but I don't think Purifoy will get the same decision as Wiley did. In which case, he'll either transfer or play overseas to get paid, imo. That is why i think Wiley is more likely to return, regardless of the draft decision looming.
quote:Because once he does that, he loses his amateur status and his collegiate eligibility ends. No going back. He was most likely counseled to wait..
Purifoy has been very hesitant about going overseas
quote:I think there is a reason why he has lagged behind Wiley in the process
There is a reason why he is still here despite lagging behind Wiley in the process
This post was edited on 2/1/18 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 2/1/18 at 2:58 pm to TigerProwl24
quote:
I don't think Purifoy will get the same decision as Wiley did.
I assume you say this on gut feeling, because NCAA rules and current stances don't support this
quote:
Because once he does that, he loses his amateur status and his collegiate eligibility ends. No going back. He was most likely counseled to wait..
If he is unlikely to regain eligibility, who in their right mind would be counseling him to stay?
This post was edited on 2/1/18 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 2/1/18 at 8:13 pm to GenesChin
Temple just beat Wichita st 
Posted on 2/1/18 at 8:19 pm to auzach91
Yep. Big one. Hopefully MTSU can beat Old Dominion.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 am to GenesChin
quote:Well, we all know how clear, fair and balanced the NCAA and their rules are... Why do you say that? It is two separate cases, is it not? Why didn't they clear Purifoy when they cleared Wiley, if they both were the same case? I understand precedent but not when one case might be more egregious than the other.. Please enlighten me on the NCAA and stances, i may be missing something.
I assume you say this on gut feeling, because NCAA rules and current stances don't support this
quote:Depends on how unlikely.. the staff obviously thought there was at least a decent chance. Decent and unlikely is not the same as zero and we're talking about a young man's future, possible way of life/living/income. Don't forget the timing of this, just weeks before the season started. It's a process that takes time and he was probably counseled to be patient, be with his teammates, go to class and wait and see what transpires, in order to make the proper decision moving forward..
If he is unlikely to regain eligibility, who in their right mind would be counseling him to stay?
I could seriously go on and on about all things this topic but Person fricked those kids life up in the short term and has put BP directly in the crosshairs. The FBI viewed us as the swindled, but the fact money exchanged hands brings the NCAA into the conversation, which Purifoy was present on at least one occasion.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 2:17 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 6:15 am to TigerProwl24
quote:
Why didn't they clear Purifoy when they cleared Wiley
Auburn didn't send in paper work. As I said, Austin Wiley was the trial case
Cases to set precedent are an extremely common legal move
quote:
money exchanged hands brings the NCAA into the conversation, which Purifoy was present on at least one occasion.
NCAA's rule change after Cecil Newton makes this point irrelevant.
Just because their rules say that, AU likely wants a clear precedent from Wiley first so they have a baseline max to point to
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 6:17 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:17 am to GenesChin
So, a resolution has been reached in Wiley's appeal according to Pearl, but no info on what that resolution is it when it will be made public?
I just read that this morning. Am I caught up, or have I missed more on that situation?
I just read that this morning. Am I caught up, or have I missed more on that situation?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:24 am to PearlJam
quote:
So, a resolution has been reached in Wiley's appeal according to Pearl, but no info on what that resolution is it when it will be made public?
I just read that this morning. Am I caught up, or have I missed more on that situation?
where did you read this?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:34 am to PearlJam
quote:
So, a resolution has been reached in Wiley's appeal according to Pearl, but no info on what that resolution is it when it will be made public?
No, the original case has a decision is pending appeals. I don't expect any paperwork to be submitted on Purifoy until Wiley's appeal process is decided
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:35 am to HailToTheChiz
It was a snippet from an al.com article I read this morning. No detail other than Pearl said a resolution has been reached.
I assume the resolution is, the NCAA denied the appeal, or we would have heard about it.
I assume the resolution is, the NCAA denied the appeal, or we would have heard about it.
quote:
Last month, the NCAA ruled that Wiley is ineligible for the entire season but could return for the 2018-19 campaign, and head coach Bruce Pearl indicated Thursday that a "resolution" has been reached in Wiley's appeal to the NCAA but said it wasn't his place to comment on the matter.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 8:38 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:39 am to PearlJam
quote:
Bruce Pearl indicated Thursday that a "resolution" has been reached in Wiley's appeal to the NCAA but said it wasn't his place to comment on the matter.
That doesn't jive with the process
Not saying I dont believe him, just that why would we cut a deal mid appeal? And if the appeal has been ruled on, why is it not made public?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:41 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:Maybe the NCAA clarified he was suspended for the regular season only and he can play in the post season?
Not saying I dont believe him, just that why would we cut a deal mid appeal?
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 8:41 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 8:43 am to HailToTheChiz
What I don't get, is how a comment like that gets buried in an article and there is no follow up or push by journalists to get the answer.
Just think if this were football and this was about a suspended key 5 star player.
The Alabama media does an awful job of covering basketball.
Just think if this were football and this was about a suspended key 5 star player.
The Alabama media does an awful job of covering basketball.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:48 am to PearlJam
quote:
if the appeal has been ruled on, why is it not made public?
There is a lot of back-channel negotiations between schools and the NCAA. Put it this way, there is a reason why Cam Newton was declared ineligible by AU and immediately cleared on reinstatement by NCAA 2 days later
AU/NCAA negotiate the outcome of this appeal before it officially is made.
quote:
Not saying I dont believe him, just that why would we cut a deal mid appeal? And
Why do people take plea deals? Same basic principle, you back channel negotiate a guaranteed settlement rather than leave it to chance
quote:
What I don't get, is how a comment like that gets buried in an article and there is no follow up or push by journalists to get the answer.
When Bruce says "wasn't his place to comment on the matter"
Read that as "don't ask more questions about this."
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 11:54 am
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:36 pm to GenesChin
quote:Sure, but reporters used to dig, develop sources and report news. If they couldn't get the goods, they usually at least let the reader know, we reached out for comment from: NCAA, Wiley, Leath, Greene, or sources at the NCAA, etc.
When Bruce says "wasn't his place to comment on the matter"
Read that as "don't ask more questions about this."
Again, if this is a football recruit, I think all of those things would be done.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:04 pm to PearlJam
I'd guess it is because every reporter understands that if a backroom "resolution" has been made and not announced, bringing it to light kills the deal.
You'd be reporting on something that you have no proof of existing.
As for sources etc, the Auburn AD has become extremely inaccessible in recent years. Not only would finding this info be near impossible, reporting on it would basically be signing your resignation
You'd be reporting on something that you have no proof of existing.
As for sources etc, the Auburn AD has become extremely inaccessible in recent years. Not only would finding this info be near impossible, reporting on it would basically be signing your resignation
Posted on 2/3/18 at 12:02 am to GenesChin
I feel like Charlie from It's Always Sunny..
Thanks for the declaration.
Thanks for the declaration.
This post was edited on 2/3/18 at 12:03 am
Posted on 2/3/18 at 12:35 am to TigerProwl24
Anybody else getting worried about tomorrow night?
AU is first in the SEC, Vandy is last.
AU is 11-0 at home, Vandy 0-7 in true road games.
Losing this game would be an Auburn as frick thing to do.
AU is first in the SEC, Vandy is last.
AU is 11-0 at home, Vandy 0-7 in true road games.
Losing this game would be an Auburn as frick thing to do.
Posted on 2/3/18 at 1:52 am to BowlJackson
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top


1





