re: 9/10 Other games

Their DC be like

Whiff on a fricking sack…

quote:

---

What?

---

I think you are so negative that I'm offering a bet. I know nothing of AHS or OHS. I just want you to not post for six months. I think this place would bloom without your negative bullshite.

I would rather have his negative bullshite then all the constant whining about him TBH.

quote:

---

I would rather have his negative bullshite then all the constant whining about him TBH.

---

Fair enough.

Is it a bet Jang? You or me not post here for six months? We'll add the two weeks when Nix throws two interceptions against Utah.

Decent try Alpine but I cannot pleasure you at this time.





Mizzou is getting creamed @ Kansas State 40-6.

I made that point. When you leave the pocket, you lose those protections.

I got nothing. Worst call I have seen since that ref tackled the USCe RB.

quote:

---

I get that but that defensive play isn’t even remotely within the realm of targeting even if he was in the pocket.

---

They saw him lower his shoulder into what should have been his head or neck area. They’re calling it on the guy not in your screen. Problem was he was upside down so he hit his feet (barely).

quote:

---

And how can there there be a targeting call but no roughing call?

---

Targeting and roughing are two different calls. Both 15 yard penalties. Targeting gets you ejected, roughing doesn’t. Targeting is automatically reviewed (they changed the rule to where the replay will get rid of the penalty), roughing can’t be reviewed.

They initially said Targeting w/ roughing. The targeting being him going head/neck area, the roughing being they thought he hit him late since he was “down” early. In that situation, even if the targeting gets overturned, the roughing can’t be reviewed and would still be a penalty.

Now where they really fricked up is changing what they initially called. They came back and said they didn’t call roughing. So when they reviewed and overturned the targeting, there was no remaining penalty. But in order for that to be plausible they also had to say he wasn’t initially down. But no flag was thrown for intentional grounding so they can’t go back and call it. So it’s just an incomplete pass, no safety.

What they should’ve done is kept the roughing (that they initially called) but say it was after the play. Then you’d still have the 15 yard penalty (which is bullshite) but it would’ve been enforced on the kickoff.

quote:

---

Theoretically if that’s possible all the targeting calls overturned should’ve had the penalty overturned as well,

---

All purely targeting calls that are overturned also have the penalties overturned as well. They changed that rule like 2 years ago.

Good explanation. Did you see any roughing? It looks to me like they they just wanted to forcestop a safety from happening

quote:

---

But no flag was thrown for intentional grounding so they can’t go back and call it.

---

Was it because intentional grounding isn’t reviewable? I remember in 2017 during the IB the refs decided to go to replay to decide one thing (can’t remember) and ultimately decided just to say **** it, we can nab Auburn for too many players on the field instead which wasn’t originally called