Started By
Message
re: 2017 Football Recruiting Thread ["N$D Bryant" Edition]
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:08 pm to jangalang
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:08 pm to jangalang
quote:
Did we not want Mckitty?
Do me a favor. Go watch McKitty's highlights and Cannella. You, honestly, tell me which one you would want? Cannella is also 6'6 where McKitty is about 6'3.
1
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:10 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Well, considering we have one on the roster...
He averages one TD for each time he is targeted too.
quote:
But hey, if you want to claim TE is not a position of need and completely void your argument that we are filling up our offensive recruiting needs with backup plans, I'm all for it.
Why would I want to void it when both can mutually exist?
Are you a proud Snead State Alumni?
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:12 pm to jangalang
quote:
Why would I want to void it when both can mutually exist?
Well, since you haven't given another position of need that we filled up with backup plans, no, no they cannot mutually exist. You just argued that the only offensive backup plan that could be argued is a position of need, is not a position of need. You defeated your own argument.
quote:
Are you a proud Snead State Alumni?
I don't think you should be questioning people's intelligence at this point
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 1:13 pm
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:13 pm to WareagleKK
quote:
Do me a favor. Go watch McKitty's highlights and Cannella. You, honestly, tell me which one you would want? Cannella is also 6'6 where McKitty is about 6'3.
I'm not the coach; my opinion is irrelevant. Did we whiff on Mckitty or not.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:14 pm to jangalang
quote:
Did we whiff on Mckitty or not.
Do you know for certain which one the coaches liked more?
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:16 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Well, since you haven't given another position of need that we filled up with backup plans, no, no they cannot mutually exist. You just argued that the only offensive backup plan that could be argued is a position of need, is not a position of need. You defeated your own argument.
I haven't given the first position of need Einstein.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:20 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Well we have been on one for months, probably even a year... one for maybe two months tops.
Do you know for certain which one the coaches liked more?
Your Snead State credentials are becoming more and more apparent with each post you submit.
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:20 pm to jangalang
quote:
I haven't given the first position of need Einstein.
Sigh. You've given who the backup plans are, ergo their position. You've also said we are filling our needs with backup plans. Then argued that the only real position of need isn't a position of need at all. So, we wouldn't be filling our offensive needs with backup plans by your own logic.
You're the one that made the argument. I can't believe I'm the one having to explain it.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:21 pm to jangalang
quote:
Your Snead State credentials are becoming more and more apparent with each post you submit.
I'm sorry you can't answer a simple question. If the coaches ended up liking Cannela more, then he wouldn't be a backup plan. Make sense now?
ETA: I even gave you he was a backup plan to begin with. So I don't care one way or the other.
quote:
Well we have been on one for months, probably even a year... one for maybe two months tops.
Sure, but how many times is our ultimate #1 target the one we start out recruiting? Hell, by that logic, Cam was a backup plan
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:23 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
You've also said we are filling our needs with backup plans.
The only person that said anything about filling our needs is KK. I don't think we filled a TE need. If anything we are wasting that scholly given that we never properly use TE's properly.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:25 pm to jangalang
quote:
I'm not the coach; my opinion is irrelevant. Did we whiff on Mckitty or not.
if we didn't want him more than Cannella, no we didn't whiff on him. Otherwise we would've used a visit on him sometime in the past month. Ya follow?
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:25 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
I'm sorry you can't answer a simple question. If the coaches ended up liking Cannela more, then he wouldn't be a backup plan. Make sense now?
Ok, so our coaches fell in love with our backup plan. He's still a backup plan, Snead State.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:26 pm to jangalang
quote:
The only person that said anything about filling our needs is KK. I
Well that's interesting...
quote:
Yeah...."crushing" our needs with backup plans.
quote:
jangalang
You were saying?
This post was edited on 12/22/16 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:26 pm to jangalang
quote:
I don't think we filled a TE need
We have 1 scholarship TE on the roster. So, yes, TE is a need. The fact that you're debating this (whether we use the TE or not) says a lot aboutcha.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:27 pm to jangalang
quote:
I don't think we filled a TE need
Great, then you've proven yourself wrong that we are filling our needs with backup plans. We are back to where we started. Thanks for playing.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:29 pm to WareagleKK
quote:
we didn't want him more than Cannella, no we didn't whiff on him. Otherwise we would've used a visit on him sometime in the past month. Ya follow?
So we actively pursued Mckittty before he committed to Oregon a long time ago, but we secretly really wanted Canella more so we waited to offer him until last month just "to make him want it." Amirite?
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:30 pm to WareagleKK
Cannella basically takes the spot of Landon Rice... He's got three years of eligibility iirc (same as rice would've had heading into 2017).
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:31 pm to jangalang
quote:
So we actively pursued Mckittty before he committed to Oregon a long time ago, but we secretly really wanted Canella more so we waited to offer him until last month just "to make him want it." Amirite?
We hadn't scouted Cannella, I'd assume. We did. Chose him over McKitty. Stopped recruiting McKitty. Iamrite.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:33 pm to WareagleKK
quote:
We hadn't scouted Cannella, I'd assume. We did. Chose him over McKitty. Stopped recruiting McKitty. Iamrite.
Cam Newton - Backup Plan.
Posted on 12/22/16 at 1:34 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Great, then you've proven yourself wrong that we are filling our needs with backup plans.
Say this until you're blue, I don't give a frick. Here are the facts:
-I never mentioned any position being a need
-Sal is a backup plan
-TE is not a need because we never use them
Page 190 of 312
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News