Started By
Message
re: 2016 Auburn Football Recruiting Thread
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:53 pm to RandySavage
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:53 pm to RandySavage
quote:Intel right now is we only take 1 more.
a couple of big LBs.
quote:Conflicting reports. AUC says he's off the board because the staff did not like the way he decommitted. AUR says he's still on the board.
Is Jamarcus King off the board since de-committing or is there a chance he jumps back on board?
Word is now he may not end up in the SEC at all. Grade issues.
This post was edited on 11/2/15 at 9:01 pm
1
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:58 pm to BowlJackson
quote:mild interest at best. They like Stove much more plus they are set to get Nate & Sam Bruce.
wasn't Florida reportedly going after him?
Posted on 11/2/15 at 8:59 pm to jangalang
McClain's highlights looked pretty damn impressive to me. That's what I base my opinion off of, I don't see these guys in camps
Posted on 11/2/15 at 9:03 pm to BowlJackson
quote:And highlights are exactly that. Only the best of kids. We don't get to see the all around film college coaches see.
McClain's highlights looked pretty damn impressive to me. That's what I base my opinion off of, I don't see these guys in camps
Posted on 11/2/15 at 9:14 pm to ellitor
quote:
they are set to get Nate
Craig doing work.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 10:23 pm to ellitor
What did King do when decommiting? I completely forgot about him
Posted on 11/2/15 at 10:26 pm to CaptainBrannigan
NCM seems like a head case, honestly.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 10:29 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:Not really. He's a 5* so his recruitment is over saturated w/ coverage. He, himself has been pretty low key through the entire process.
NCM seems like a head case, honestly.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 10:30 pm to GenesChin
quote:Decommitted on twitter and never talked to the staff about it.
What did King do when decommiting? I completely forgot about him
Posted on 11/2/15 at 10:33 pm to ellitor
Maybe I'm thinking of someone else. I thought I remembered some drama from him, but you're right, could be because he's under a microscope.
Posted on 11/2/15 at 10:37 pm to ellitor
JLee said DT Adam McLean from 2015 class will OV. He was 247 ~125 for 2015 class. EE and eligible next year
6'2 305 right now and looks like muscle
6'2 305 right now and looks like muscle
Posted on 11/2/15 at 11:01 pm to GenesChin
He had academic problems that kept him out of Maryland, right?
Posted on 11/2/15 at 11:17 pm to GenesChin
quote:You're a full weekend and a number of pages late bro. He just had his AU OV.
JLee said DT Adam McLean from 2015 class will OV. He was 247 ~125 for 2015 class. EE and eligible next year
Posted on 11/2/15 at 11:18 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
McClain's highlights looked pretty damn impressive to me. That's what I base my opinion off of, I don't see these guys in camps
A guy on AUFamily posted the following:
quote:
Been watching this kid for a few weeks now. Looks good when he's got the ball but definitely takes the play off if he is not involved. On D, if the ball goes the other way he just stands and watches. Definitely hope he corrects this before he gets on campus.
Then one of the board "semi-insiders" (WarDamnEagleWDE) replied with the following:
quote:
Waste of a sholly IMO. Another camp warrior I'm afraid.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 1:28 am to metafour
Considering everybody around Auburn's track record of evaluating recruits he'll probably be Auburn's first Biletnikoff winner
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:16 am to TheJones
He had transcript issues and had to leave Maryland. They ended up getting worked out but too late to stay enrolled.
Don't see how someone on AUFamily would possibly know if he is a workout warrior considering he is from Maryland
Don't see how someone on AUFamily would possibly know if he is a workout warrior considering he is from Maryland
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:23 am to GenesChin
quote:They're talking about the WR commit from FL, Marquis McClain.
Don't see how someone on AUFamily would possibly know if he is a workout warrior considering he is from Maryland
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 8:24 am
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:38 am to joeyb147
Wasn't AUFamily/AEagle the ones who fought for Jake Holland to be a 4* back in the day too?
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:46 am to GenesChin
quote:And Frazier to be a 5* IIRC.
Wasn't AUFamily/AEagle the ones who fought for Jake Holland to be a 4* back in the day too?
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:02 am to GenesChin
quote:No. It was the Bunker. Rivals is the site that had him a 3* til the last rating & Bunkerites were bitching about it daily before the 4* bump.
Wasn't AUFamily/AEagle the ones who fought for Jake Holland to be a 4* back in the day too?
Page 311 of 498
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News