Started By
Message
re: Interesting - GSD related
Posted on 11/16/17 at 5:47 am to Senior Sidewalker
Posted on 11/16/17 at 5:47 am to Senior Sidewalker
quote:
You don't need revenue, you need profit. I hope none of the folks on here went to the Sam M. Walton College of Business
Wal Mart is having their best year since 1999.
Not sure what the frick you're talking about.
Yea Amazon is killing it growth wise but like I said, they're no where near as profitable right now. They will be one day most likely but not yet.
And our athletic department is super profitable. Despite the annual charity game down in LR for all the poor dumb redneck camo UCA fans. The irony is all of those losers despised Barry/hand outs and don't even realize that's exactly what the LR game is. It's Football Food Stamps.
There I said it.
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 5:50 am
0
Posted on 11/16/17 at 8:10 am to Senior Sidewalker
I'm just saying, if you are looking at revenue, it's like judging a pitcher on innings pitched instead of ERA
Without expenses, you can't tell the true story. Sure LR has a smaller revenue, but I bet it is also cheaper to put a game on down there. So it's possible a WMS game brings in more money than a RRS game. It's impossible to know without more info. Not sure why slides would be prepared and shown on that basis
Without expenses, you can't tell the true story. Sure LR has a smaller revenue, but I bet it is also cheaper to put a game on down there. So it's possible a WMS game brings in more money than a RRS game. It's impossible to know without more info. Not sure why slides would be prepared and shown on that basis
Posted on 11/16/17 at 8:15 am to Senior Sidewalker
Doubtful, but possible. The travel expenses, even to LR aren't cheap.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:25 am to cubsfan5150
quote:
Doubtful, but possible. The travel expenses, even to LR aren't cheap.
Agreed. There is no way that WMS is more profitable than DWRRS. Expenses at DWRRS would have to be $3.7M a game more than WMS for WMS to make more money.
The University is in Fayetteville. The players see WMS as a road game. Other schools use WMS for negative recruiting. It's time to let it go.
If they fired Long over WMS, then there is no hope for this program. Burn it down.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:31 am to Senior Sidewalker
quote:
Without expenses, you can't tell the true story. Sure LR has a smaller revenue, but I bet it is also cheaper to put a game on down there. So it's possible a WMS game brings in more money than a RRS game. It's impossible to know without more info. Not sure why slides would be prepared and shown on that basis
Did you go to Walton College?
There are what 20,000 less seats, probably 30,000 if you count the empties the last few years and no suites or clubs.
Do the math with tickets, vending and how much it costs to move the entire team down there.
Doesn't take Warren Buffet man.. Come on.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 10:53 am to hilltophog
Northwest only accounting for 51% of games in Fay? 
Go to the games! It's in your backyard.
Go to the games! It's in your backyard.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:06 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Northwest only accounting for 51% of games in Fay?
Go to the games! It's in your backyard.
It's in everyone's backyard. 5 Hours is not a long way.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 11:11 am to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
quote:
If they fired Long over WMS, then there is no hope for this program.
Do you just dream this stuff up?
Posted on 11/16/17 at 1:01 pm to boogiewoogie1978
That's 7% of the NWA population showing up for NWA games.
By comparison only 3% of Central Arkansas's population went to the Little Rock game.
By comparison only 3% of Central Arkansas's population went to the Little Rock game.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 1:03 pm to Ronaldo Burgundiaz
quote:
There is no way that WMS is more profitable than DWRRS
I agree. But why not show the numbers on that slideshow if true?
I'm just asking questions
Posted on 11/16/17 at 2:22 pm to Senior Sidewalker
quote:Interesting
That's 7% of the NWA population showing up for NWA games.
By comparison only 3% of Central Arkansas's population went to the Little Rock game.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 3:02 pm to Senior Sidewalker
quote:
That's 7% of the NWA population showing up for NWA games.
By comparison only 3% of Central Arkansas's population went to the Little Rock game.
Nice spin but there are more people in Central AR.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 3:06 pm to STLhog
quote:
5 Hours is not a long way.
If you can't afford to get a room and are driving back after a late game.....yes, why yes, it is a long damn way.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 3:11 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
Nice spin but there are more people in Central AR.
good god. do you know what the little "%" symbol means?
This post was edited on 11/16/17 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 11/16/17 at 3:41 pm to Senior Sidewalker
quote:
good god. do you know what the little "%" symbol means?
Yes I know what it means that's why I said nice spin.
On paper 7% compared to 3% looks good. However when looking at total population those numbers are deceiving.
If 100% of Fay shows and only 1% of India shows up which is more. Like I said nice spin.
You should have more than 7%. It's right in your backyard and it's the home of the Hogs.
Posted on 11/16/17 at 3:50 pm to boogiewoogie1978
if the words, "per capita" were there... then the % of a specific number wouldn't matter....
Posted on 11/16/17 at 5:29 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
You should have more than 7%. It's right in your backyard and it's the home of the Hogs.
The 3% was also in Central Arkansas's back yard. Plus they only get one a year. It should be a special event to juice attendance even more
Sorry. Ball is in LRs court and these stats prove they aren't showing up
Page 2 of 2
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News