Started By
Message
re: 2013 Arkansas Recruiting Thread - Football & Basketball Commits
Posted on 2/5/13 at 3:50 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 2/5/13 at 3:50 pm to hawgfaninc
Craig Haubert is on Bo Mattingly. He isn't being kind to AR.
quote:
Bo Mattingly ?@SportsTalkwBo Haubert: I think the recruiting ceiling at Ark realistically is somewhere in the middle of the pack in the SEC w/big year here or there.
quote:
Bo Mattingly ?@SportsTalkwBo Haubert: Arkansas will likely finish toward the bottom of the SEC in recruiting, but that means they'll be in the top 40 nationally.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 3:51 pm to DC RaiseHerBack
quote:
Richard Davenport ?@ArRecruitingGuy 3:36 update- QB Damon Mitchell's announcement time
quote:
Quarterback Damon Mitchell will announce his decision at 1:15 eastern time tomorrow. He will chose from Arkansas, Rutgers, Iowa and Georgia Tech.
This post was edited on 2/5/13 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 2/5/13 at 3:51 pm to LOCO5150
Brave to predict us in the Top 40 since we are currently sitting at 24.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 3:52 pm to LOCO5150
We can't help it that ESPN's recruiting service sucks.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 3:56 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
over under at 10 on the number of spiteful tweets he gets tomorrow after signing with UCLA
way over. at least 4 will be from me
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:02 pm to LOCO5150
quote:
Craig Haubert is on Bo Mattingly. He isn't being kind to AR.
quote:
I think the recruiting ceiling at Ark realistically is somewhere in the middle of the pack in the SEC w/big year here or there.
That's actually pretty much spot-on. Even if we manage to reel in a top 10-15 class next year, which I think is likely, we'll still have an above average chance of being behind LSU, Florida, Bama, aTm, UGA, Auburn, etc.
The SEC is just that brutal.
But that's fine. I'd MUCH rather be middle of the pack than bottom of the barrel. It's not so much being the 4th, 5th, 6th, etc.
I want have an "average recruit" who is only marginally behind Bama's average recruit. Say theirs are rated at 3.92 stars in aggregate...I hope ours are 3.6 as opposed to 3.3. I don't care if that puts us at 6th or 8th in the SEC.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:08 pm to ocelot4ark
We've never had a staff this good at recruiting since it hit the mainstream either. If we have a decent year we could crack the top 10 next year IMO
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:10 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
We've never had a staff this good at recruiting since it hit the mainstream either. If we have a decent year we could crack the top 10 next year IMO
True. We could be freakin' 6th and STILL have the 6th best class in the SEC.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:13 pm to ocelot4ark
I understand that we aren't a powerhouse football program right now. We have the makings to be though. To say someone's ceiling though is middle of the pack or average no matter how much of a compliment it's intended to be, just doesn't sit well with me.
We should be in the middle of the pack every year in recruiting in SEC. That is not our ceiling though.
In my opinion anyway. We've been middle of the road in the SEC in recruiting with a half arse effort for a while.
We should be in the middle of the pack every year in recruiting in SEC. That is not our ceiling though.
In my opinion anyway. We've been middle of the road in the SEC in recruiting with a half arse effort for a while.
This post was edited on 2/5/13 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:21 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
True. We could be freakin' 6th and STILL have the 6th best class in the SEC.
Top 10 there isn't much difference in overall talent level though. If we can consistently hit 10-15 we should be competing for titles
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:22 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
True. We could be freakin' 6th and STILL have the 6th best class in the SEC.
Yes, but if you look at the points on 247, which is how they rank these classes points.
Bama is #1 with 778.64 we are 25th with with 725.84, yes that is big gap, but the gap to #2 Florida is pretty big, 766.04.
You have to go to #15 (Texas) in the rankings before you get above a +10 point margin and #30(Wisconsin) before you reach -10.
In the SEC that 10 point margin puts Carolina, Auburn, Ms. State, Arkansas, and Tennessee all within one another the 7-11 ranked classes this year.
So saying "mid pack in the SEC" sounds mediocre but when the classes are so close to one another and vary in order across the services it still comes down to filling needs and developing players by the coaching staffs, especially when only two teams in the SEC (Mizzou and Kentucky) are not in the top 30 in the recruiting rankings this year.
It would be different if you had a couple teams in the top 15, a couple more in the top 30, a couple more in the top 40, the rest trying to stay in the top 80.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:22 pm to LOCO5150
I'd say we've been closer to bottom of the barrel with an occasional dip towards the middle of the pack. If we could cement ourselves into the middle and consistently pull the 6th or 7th ranked classes in the SEC, we'd probably win an SEC title. We've traditionally done more with less.
But we are forever hindered by our geography. We don't have the recruiting advantages that aTm, LSU, Bama, Auburn, Ole Miss, MSU, Florida, Georgia, etc, etc have...that benefit of a shite ton of D1 athletes coming out EVERY.SINGLE.YEAR who would instantly put us in their top 2-3, no matter what.
But we are forever hindered by our geography. We don't have the recruiting advantages that aTm, LSU, Bama, Auburn, Ole Miss, MSU, Florida, Georgia, etc, etc have...that benefit of a shite ton of D1 athletes coming out EVERY.SINGLE.YEAR who would instantly put us in their top 2-3, no matter what.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:24 pm to DaleDenton
That's pretty much the same point I was making about average stars. I don't care if we're 6th or 8th. I just want to be reasonably close in terms of our average player to the best team each year. If the top team has an average committed player of 3.92 stars, hopefully we won't be too far behind. If we can stay within striking distance each year we can make up for talent disparities through player development, redshirt program, and coaching.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:27 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
But we are forever hindered by our geography.
We have had staffs with poor strategies.
Nebraska, Oregon, and the majority of the B1G (increasingly in the future) are located away from "prime" recruiting grounds or are left to fight it out among "every one" in the closest grounds (Texas for us).
The previous two staffs recruited northern Florida against "everyone" from the SEC, ACC, Big East, etc because it was closer, when that didn't work they demphasized the area or just went after the diamonds in the rough. Same happened in Texas, when they could beat out Texas/OU, they started digging for diamonds.
This staff is trying different strategies than used in the past, which is a nice change of pace.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:31 pm to ocelot4ark
quote:
That's pretty much the same point I was making about average stars. I don't care if we're 6th or 8th. I just want to be reasonably close in terms of our average player to the best team each year. If the top team has an average committed player of 3.92 stars, hopefully we won't be too far behind. If we can stay within striking distance each year we can make up for talent disparities through player development, redshirt program, and coaching.
The only thing that will hurt us here is our instate recruits who do not go to the combines, the guys who hand out stars do so more off this than game films and most of our instate guys don't go to their combines or the team camps where the services have scouts as it can be costly to attend.
Good example is Brandon Allen, he was a 3star and I think he was finally bumped by rivals when they actually saw him play, they admitted they never saw enough of him to properly evaluate him.
Another example is Arkansas use to have a top 25 when Rivals had the staff to evaluate more players, then is it was cut to 20, then 15, now it is down to 10.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:34 pm to ocelot4ark
I'm going to be sad when this staff is broken up in a couple years. I think we get 2, maybe 3 years max with them.
If CBB turns it around pretty quick everyone will be gunning for our staff.
If CBB turns it around pretty quick everyone will be gunning for our staff.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:41 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
stop raining down with that shite.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:42 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
The only thing that will hurt us here is our instate recruits who do not go to the combines, the guys who hand out stars do so more off this than game films and most of our instate guys don't go to their combines or the team camps where the services have scouts as it can be costly to attend.
Good example is Brandon Allen, he was a 3star and I think he was finally bumped by rivals when they actually saw him play, they admitted they never saw enough of him to properly evaluate him.
This x1000
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:45 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
What we need is someone to stay around long enough to make us an actual power every year, and to get our recruiting to a level where people view Arkansas as a tier-1 place to go play football at.
We have the money.
We have the fans.
We have the facilities.
We are in the right conference.
We just need someone to do something with all of these resources, and also do so while putting an emphasis on recruiting. Petrino did the former, but with his lack of recruiting we were sure to see a drop-off, even if he left on "conventional" terms.
I think CBB will stick around long enough to turn us around. If we can get 5 or 6 years out of him, maybe a couple BCS bowls in there, I think it will establish a good foundation for the future of hog football, and we will come to expect to flip top kids out of Florida, Texas, etc.
We have the money.
We have the fans.
We have the facilities.
We are in the right conference.
We just need someone to do something with all of these resources, and also do so while putting an emphasis on recruiting. Petrino did the former, but with his lack of recruiting we were sure to see a drop-off, even if he left on "conventional" terms.
I think CBB will stick around long enough to turn us around. If we can get 5 or 6 years out of him, maybe a couple BCS bowls in there, I think it will establish a good foundation for the future of hog football, and we will come to expect to flip top kids out of Florida, Texas, etc.
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:49 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
Ok, I get what you guys are saying as far as you have to look at the level of competition, and you make good points, and I agree with you on some level, but the competitiveness in me will never concede that the best we can be is middle of the pack in anything. I'm sorry.
Everything good has to start somewhere, and by damn, why can't greatness start right here and right now? All I'm saying is that I won't concede that our ceiling is middle of the road.
This staff will probably have 2-3 years, but the way Coach B situated his contract, he has the $ in place to hire the hot guys as assistants and recruiters, so I think we will be covered in this aspect. I do really like what we have now though.
Everything good has to start somewhere, and by damn, why can't greatness start right here and right now? All I'm saying is that I won't concede that our ceiling is middle of the road.
This staff will probably have 2-3 years, but the way Coach B situated his contract, he has the $ in place to hire the hot guys as assistants and recruiters, so I think we will be covered in this aspect. I do really like what we have now though.
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top


3




