
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/20/26 at 5:46 pm to Amarillo Tide
Based on the state of world affairs and air travel, I am completely against it.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 5:58 pm to BFANLC
100 percent against the uk.
100 percent against maxico.
100 percent against canada.
i mean geez, going to california for a rose bowl game should be foreign country enough.
100 percent against maxico.
100 percent against canada.
i mean geez, going to california for a rose bowl game should be foreign country enough.
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:26 pm to crimsontater
I'm conceptually against it but, frankly, if the money were right then I think you could see it happening just to bankroll roster payroll.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 1:09 am to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
We wouldn't be going there to play Cambridge or Oxford. The other team will have jet lag also. So blaming a loss on that would be a bullshite excuse.
The Rams and 49ers took entirely different approaches week one playing in Australia, and it showed.
So what you're saying is that it wasn't the jet lag, but how the coaches prepared.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like the idea of playing overseas, either. But blaming a loss on a factor thay affects both teams equally is stupid. It's a loser mentality. And having that mentality just breeds more losing, because you continue to deflect the blame for losses from where it should be focused.
Latest Alabama News

Popular
Back to top

1






