Started By
Message

re: Pat Dye "all Condi Rice knows about football someone told her"

Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:45 pm to
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99038 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

No. I didn't say that now did I?


You said football knowledge. One would assume that if you're an integral member of an interviewing committee for a football coach and over an athletic budget that you just might have a decent understanding of the sport. That's just a hunch.

But I'll be happily waiting on your list of millions who have more "knowlege".
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Neither should active AD's of BCS conference teams. But it's what it is.


This is a huge conflict of interst. Pat HAden and Dan Radicovich...give me a break!
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33742 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:47 pm to
Mike Dubose
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11331 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:47 pm to
I would prefer a true football insider. This feels like a PR "celebrity" appointment, but Rice is probably not as bad as most think.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

I would prefer a true football insider. This feels like a PR "celebrity" appointment, but Rice is probably not as bad as most think.


Actually I think she will be fine her state department experience will serve her well in the committe environment. I do not really have a problem with her.

I just have to agree with and support what Dye says because well, he is Pat Dye and he is never wrong.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 3:53 pm to
Tom Jernstedt is an NCAA basketball guy as well. Every single person appointed could have arguments made against them. Folks jumping on the bash Condi bandwagon have little arguments, if they don't make similar arguments against anyone picked.

As I said before, it's not going to be a difficult decision to pick the top 4 teams. The BIG issue, imo, will be how they seed them, especially if 2 from one conference make the cut and it appears obvious to fans, they are 1 and 2. Will the committee seed them for a potential rematch/all conference matchup. Or will they purposely seed them in round one to eliminate one, but guaranteeing one makes the game? That will be the hand wringing issue, I think.
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

You said football knowledge. One would assume that if you're an integral member of an interviewing committee for a football coach and over an athletic budget that you just might have a decent understanding of the sport.


You would think that wouldn't you? I wish that was always true.
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7636 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Heaven forbid she provide a different perspective based on her own experience that might come in useful when contrasted with the views of others who have been firmly rooted in the sport for 40 years.


Condi Rice is very bright. She is a fan of the game. She is a quick study. You don't have to have been a player to understand the game, nor do you have to be a genius (although she is pretty close)to be able to pick the best 4 teams for a playoff. Most folks who follow college football with some attention could get those picks right most of the time by season's end. If you look at some of the ridiculous votes in the Coaches Poll, I feel certain that she will be a better selector than some of those guys.
Posted by Bama Bird
Member since Dec 2011
Member since Mar 2013
19030 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:11 pm to
Had this committee been formed 45 years ago, Nixon would've been on it, while serving as President. Just think about that one
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4281 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I just have to agree with and support what Dye says because well, he is Pat Dye and he is never wrong.








But seriously, if they were jonesing to put a woman on the committee why not pick a former sideline reporter or one of the women who call football games (like the lady who used to do all the early AM Big 10 games, don't know her name). Because it makes too much gd sense to put people on a college football committee who have actually been in or around actual college football. Putting Condi on the committee is borderline to picking a random fan out of the stands on a Saturday to join the committee.


And don't get me started on the idea of putting serving fricking AD's of BCS teams on the committee, what a load of horse shite that is.
This post was edited on 10/7/13 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Tiger the Hutt
Metairie
Member since May 2013
517 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

y, if they were jonesing to put a woman on the committee why not pick a former sideline reporter


Are you... are fricking serious?

Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37299 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Are you... are fricking serious?


that is exactly what i was going to say. as if sideline reporters have to know more than one thing at a time- coach what are you going to do differently in the 2nd half? coach- were you pleased with the play overall? good god, we could all be one then.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44018 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:24 pm to
What a dick.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

pick a former sideline reporter


Like this one?
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12657 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:32 pm to
This post was edited on 10/7/13 at 4:33 pm
Posted by Pragmatic PiG
Plumas County
Member since Nov 2012
758 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:33 pm to
Best thing he ever said
Posted by Nortizzle
Posibarner™ Captain
Member since Nov 2006
23170 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:34 pm to
Everything you know about dick suckin your daddy told you.
Posted by WonderWartHawg
Member since Dec 2010
10401 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 4:52 pm to
Not denying she's bright, and very good IN HER FIELD.

Her field is NOT FOOTBALL (regardless of how much or how little she knows about it.)

I do not believe she has any business trying to determine which teams are in the play offs.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 5:07 pm to
All I know is that I'd trust pretty much anyone over Pat Dye to pick a playoff team. The guy's a drunk and doesn't know to wash his hands after sticking his fingers in the turf. It's perfectly possible for a smart, capable, educated person to understand how good a given team is without having spent his autumns in high school playing 3rd string DB just to elevate his chances of getting laid by girls too ugly to attract the attention of the star quarterback. I played high school ball (2nd string, bitches) and I'll freely admit I'd trust Rice over pretty much every football player I knew because, frick, she's smarter and more capable of objective analysis than any of them.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 5:10 pm to
Lot of misogynistic pseudo-rationality up in this thread. Wimmens can do what they want. DWI
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter