Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:20 pm to rockiee
quote:
As someone who has not kept up with this new ordeal, who is saying this? The owner of the store and employees?
I've personally never seen Rebel rags use security tags on apparel. Unless they've changed that within the past 2 years, then you can walk into the store right now and verify that.
The other two....are coming from an inner circle that includes the owner. Both of those should be easy to prove if Terry Warren isn't bullshitting. Purchase records of retailers usually have a breakdown of payment types that include gift card purchases(the ones I've worked at over the years did).
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:20 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Good thing you Ole Miss fans won't get banned here. You can still exchange posts with fans of real college football teams.
Is that why I see you in Bama threads?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:26 pm to pankReb
Yes, someone has to bring real football to a Bama thread.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:37 pm to pankReb
quote:
then you can walk into the store right now and verify that.
Did the player(s) say they saw them remove the tags or that they had been removed. Something minor and seems sketchy on the player(s) part either way.
quote:
Purchase records of retailers usually have a breakdown of payment types that include gift card purchases(the ones I've worked at over the years did).
If this accusation is true, do you think they would go about it in normal procedure? I don't think it would be hard to make this untraceable assuming it is true.
The thing about the girl's name that the owner at the store doesn't identify would be very hard to cover up. I guess the only way you could really argue that from the players' perspective would be this girl having a direct connection to the school and not the store.
I'm sure some of what I posted can already be dis-proven or proven. I haven't kept up with this to much but it is interesting.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 10:51 pm to rockiee
Also when some of the items they say they got were never in inventory and they can't produce one item of the $2,800.00 worth of clothing they supposedly received. Think about that. Let's say that the average over priced item is $100 a pop. They can't produce 1 item out of 28 that they got 18 months ago? You seriously believe that?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 10:59 pm to ABearsFanNMS
And there are no photographs of said apparel.
Leo loves social media and chronicles his life through photographs.
Not a single one?
Leo loves social media and chronicles his life through photographs.
Not a single one?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:00 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
You seriously believe that?
Of what you just posted? No but I'm sure there is more context then that. As I said earlier, haven't kept up with all the details on this situation.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 11:03 pm to MullenBoys
Man, frick all this shite. Whatever the ncaa hits om with is fine with me. I'm tired of talking and speculating about it. They will get penalized and thats good enough. LSU should and will kick their asses anyway. It really doesnt matter. It's not like we are talking about bama, auburn, florida, georgia or tennessee...teams with real potential. It fricking ole miss. If they have to cheat their asses of to even compete, then so be it. Just give them their sanctions and lets move along, bc it's not like they're a relevant program anyway, or ever will be. LSU will keep doing what it does regardless, and we are going to kick the dogshit out of them regardless. Give them their penalty and lets play ball.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:56 am to ImayGoLesMiles
How many more years until LSU beats Bama?
Another 7 years?
Another 7 years?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 8:49 am to pankReb
quote:
Security tags
Employee named emily
Gift cards used on specific days of the amounts Leo and Kobe testified.
those three things are pretty big and are said to have absolutely no truth.
Minor details. But why are yall so stuck on RR issue when the university agrees with:
the football program provided free meals to [Student-Athlete 39], his mother and stepfather in conjunction with an unofficial visit.
Farrar arranged for [Booster 13],a representative of the institution's athletics interests, to provide roundtrip transportation between [Location 9] and Oxford, Mississippi, (approximately [Distance 3]) to [Student-Athlete 39] in conjunction with an unofficial visit
Farrar arranged for [Booster 12], a representative of the institution's athletics interests, to provide [Student-Athlete 39] with transportation
Farrar arranged for [Booster 13] to provide [Student-Athlete 39] and [Family Member 11], [Student-Athlete 39’s]cousin, with roundtrip transportation
Additionally, on the nights of August 15 and 16, Farrar arranged free hotel lodging for [Student-Athlete 39] and [Family Member 11]
Farrar arranged free hotel lodging for [Student-Athlete 39]; [Family Member 11]; [Family Member 12], [Student-Athlete 39’s] cousin; and [Student-Athlete 46], [Student-Athlete 39’s]friend and then football prospective student-athlete, in conjunction with an unofficial visit and home football game at the institution. The football program also provided the four of them with free meals on this occasion.
Farrar arranged for [Family Member 11] to receive two nights' free hotel lodging during [Student-Athlete 39’s] official paid visit.
But yall are so concerned about No. 9 because the timeline is off by an hour or two or what a clerk's name was, like this is a Law and Order episode.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:35 am to Cdawg
quote:
But yall are so concerned about No. 9 because the timeline is off by an hour or two or what a clerk's name was, like this is a Law and Order episode.
Yall keep saying this. Yall keep starting thread after thread with post after post about OM's investigation, day after day, yet you apparently haven't read anything on it.
Leo said that there were theft detecting devices on the clothes. There has never been theft detecting devices on clothes at rebel rags. They have the Starkville coach who was with Kobe at rebel rags say it is a lie. They have accountants that went through the books that prove $2800 of free merchandise is a lie and how they allegedly paid for it (gift cards). They have video footage of them in the stores walking out with less than $100 worth of stuff and proof of purchase, which was not a gift card. They aren't off by an hour, or by a name, every single thing they claimed has been called a lie.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:39 am to Whereisomaha
So if a crime is committed, like a bank robbery, but the robber was careful as to not leave any evidence and not get caught, the bank robbery didn't happen?
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:41 am to Whereisomaha
Also throw in Leo claiming to be in Oxford on a date that he was actually playing an away football game in HS. Another "minor detail" though.....lol
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:43 am to SouthOfHere
quote:
So if a crime is committed, like a bank robbery, but the robber was careful as to not leave any evidence and not get caught, the bank robbery didn't happen?
If someone said someone robbed a bank and nothing was taken from the bank which is proved by accountants and video footage, then no, no crime will be charged.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 9:52 am
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:55 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
They have accountants that went through the books that prove $2800 of free merchandise is a lie
My favorite. "We got free stuff"
"Well then, let's go check the ledger to see if there is an entry for 'free stuff'. Nope isn't there, must be made up"
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:57 am to pankReb
Terry Warren could be purchasing from the distributor directly with his own funds and it never hit RR's books. hell the university could be buying it and having it delivered to RR and someone simply be the middleman giving it to them. OM should lose their accreditations because so many of you are so f***king stupid it is ridiculous. You can't imagine a scenario where this could happen. that is why so many of you get caught when you break the law. You guys are IDIOTS.
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:05 am to UAtide11
quote:
We got free stuff"
"Well then, let's go check the ledger to see if there is an entry for 'free stuff'. Nope isn't there, must be made up"
First $2800 at a small business isn't as easy to hide from a third party accountant than you think, but yes, if that was all there was then I'd agree. That's laughable.
Its not just that. I love how you quoted the one thing that could be altered and ignored the rest.
Do yall really think they are bringing a lawsuit if they committed the crime? They will be audited by criminal investigators and there is far more to lose than to gain anyway. The cleanest business in the world do not want to be audited.
On a message board everyone has a bias and everyone sees what they want to see but at least look at the factors to determine if you are being logical or not.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 10:07 am
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:09 am to yatesdog38
quote:
Terry Warren could be purchasing from the distributor directly with his own funds and it never hit RR's books. hell the university could be buying it and having it delivered to RR and someone simply be the middleman giving it to them. OM should lose their accreditations because so many of you are so f***king stupid it is ridiculous. You can't imagine a scenario where this could happen. that is why so many of you get caught when you break the law. You guys are IDIOTS.
For the third time on this page. Why is it that you who comment on this investigation day after day do not read the information about the investigation? Or are you just ignoring that Leo said there were theft protectors on the clothes? Are you just ignoring that he changed his story three times? Are you ignoring that another MSU player and a Starkville coach said his story isn't true? Are you just ignoring that video footage shows them walking out with less than $100 worth of merchandise?
Lets just focus on how Terry could trick accountants, and commit an illegal act, and not illegal with the NCAA, but actually criminal, and after committing such crime, he brings a law suit which exposes him to criminal investors for said crime.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 10:11 am
Posted on 6/22/17 at 10:12 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
yet you apparently haven't read anything on it.
I've read it and the response. Sounds like a response of someone with a hand in the cookie jar and using any minute detail to disprove it. Your school, Barney, RR has latched onto this one allegation(no. 9) as a misdirection off the big picture. I just have a hard time believing the investigator would have included that b/c (3) different parties admitted receiving free merchandise when a quick search of the RR owner has him posing in pics with ole miss athletes of past and present. The interaction of Farrar and Kiffin with the booster is plausible especially when the University agrees those two have committed other violations.
But let's throw that no. 9 out. Do you want to address no. 14 how Barney introduced SA39 to two different boosters and lied about it? So who is the dishonest one here?
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News