Favorite team:Ole Miss 
Location:Defending National Champs Fan
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:64454
Registered on:3/29/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
[quote]Push will come to shove when these players getting paid aren’t delivering titles or living up to the expectations[/quote] Yep. The market will correct itself. ...
[quote]The players aren't worth more, they are easily replaceable and are replaced constantly. [/quote] Free market capitalism says differently. [quote]False. The schools and the players have always come to the terms of the compensation for play sports. They play football, they get a scho...
Yep. And now we have a bunch of armchair dabo sweeney’s threatening to quit watching but somehow they’re still here. :lol:...
[quote]And talking about communism while using the government to control organizations. [/quote] You really are an idiot. :lol: I’d love to hear your take on child labor laws. :lol: [quote]I'd just stop watching. It's not my only hobby in life, I have many.[/quote] But you won’t. This is...
[quote]Honestly, NIL thing is annoying, not because it's changed our status (UK had the typical season it does under stoops) but because odds are the person cares 0 about the school and will leave at the drop of hat/opt put of bowl games.[/quote] So they’re now able to do the exact same thing coa...
[quote]Because that is his value. [/quote] Ah. :lol: so what person is responsible for determining said value? I’ll answer that for you…..it’s the person who is willing to pay said value. But the “oh no see that’s different!” argument is fricking hilarious. [quote] Also probably why you have no...
You got a little taste of it with the modern landscape of coaching salaries. They used to be thought of as having loyalty. They’ve been nothing more than paid mercenaries pimped out to the highest bidder by super agents. Funny that I don’t remember the other bama fan bitching about Saban being en...

re: D1 Baseball Field of 64 - 4/24

Posted by pankReb on 4/24/24 at 3:40 pm
Ole Miss too high...
[quote]You are the one having to take things out of context and claim a victory based on that. [/quote] I’m not taking anything at all out of context. It was ruled that athletes cannot be prevented from profiting off of their own name, image, or likeness. You’re just throwing an absolute bitch f...
[quote]I think they work hand-in-hand. Restrict the current transfer rules where kids are have to wait 2 yrs to be eligible to play if they transfer. These players/agents/parents/uncles are non-stop shopping these kids to the highest bidder. If a parent or agent knows after his 5* WR signs with...
[quote]They are profiting on their abilities[/quote] Yep. They sure are. Thanks capitalism! Sure am glad this is a country where two consenting parties are allowed to negotiate salaries!...
[quote]quote: Could they go get a side job? Yes or no No[/quote] Thanks. You freely admit that you’re absolutely wrong. [quote]someone can start a different league or whatever and pay them[/quote] Why? We already have that league. Maybe you should go start a league and refuse to pay ...
[quote]Nobody is preventing them from making money.[/quote] Could they go get a side job? Yes or no [quote]And I've never gone to the government to demand a company give me a raise,[/quote] That’s because you were never restricted by a governing body on how much money you could make off of ...
[quote]frick entitlement society.[/quote] Yeah how fricking dare someone be able to make money in a capitalist society. I’m glad there’s someone like 3down10 who is perfectly fine making minimum wage and never asking for a raise. :lol:...
[quote]SMU would have utilized NIL to purchase players.[/quote] But they didn’t. They pay-for-played. It doesn’t matter what they “would have done”. It only matters what they did. And what they did was pay-for-play. [quote]Reggie Bush was given improper benefits and stripped of his trophy...
[quote]It is now pay for play.[/quote] Ok. Prove it. Show me where it’s written that pay-for-play is legal. ...
[quote] Selective enforcement was a big part of how the NCAA’s credibility crumbled.[/quote] I agree. But that isn't relevant to the discussion...
[quote]Bama gets the wins vacated from 2007[/quote] Wasn't this related to players selling back free books? I don't believe that's covered under NIL unless they happened to autograph them. [quote]SMU gets all kind of shite[/quote] Try again. NIL =/= Pay-for-play...
[quote] Underrated post IMO.[/quote] if your intent is to show your stupidity on the topic, then I agree....
[quote] Your argument had nothing to do with the nuances of the rule infractions.[/quote] nuances of rule infractions shouldn't require being stated. It's pretty easily understood. [quote]Both cases would be deemed legal now through NIL.[/quote] Wrong. The NIL does not allow for direct pay...