Started By
Message

re: Is Auburn an Elite Program?

Posted on 11/14/10 at 11:05 pm to
Posted by jtiger123
Member since Nov 2007
341 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 11:05 pm to
i think another factor into this definition of "elite" should be the eras of CFB. before the scholarship limits, it was a whole different ball game(no pun intended). the 95 scholly limit was implemented in 1977(i belive) then trickled down to the modern 85 scholly limit in 1991.....so should elite be judge in 2 different eras? i think so, since parity or atleast the attempt at parity started then
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 11:21 pm to
I always like to use 1984 as a dividing point between an older era and the new era of CFB. That was the year of the huge Supreme Court case over television rights that replaced the NCAA with the CFA for a few years. That was also the first year in a very long time when a non-major team (BYU) snuck in and won a national title with the Gators facing sanctions. (Other people point to the Canes' 1983 title over Nebraska as being a big deal.)
Posted by PPeterson1
Choklahoma
Member since Jul 2010
2013 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 12:18 am to
quote:

THE elite programs in the country are:

Alabama
Michigan
Nebraska
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Oklahoma
Penn State
Texas
USC

That's it boys. Everybody else is at least one step down.
No....those are the most historic programs, but they're not the most elite in this time period. Florida and LSU are elite in this time period.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36110 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 1:56 am to
Notre Dame is such a difficult call

They have frankly been god awful for a couple decades now... and yet they are on the short list for best program of all time when you go back to the 1900 stuff

They have ONE NC in the last 30 years... if you extend back to the 1960s that number goes up to 4... which sounds great till you realize that's one less than Miami and one more than LSU
Posted by irish thug 527
Member since Apr 2008
553 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 2:33 am to
quote:


Michigan



Um, no.

quote:


Nebraska



Yeah they looked really elite against Iowa State last week... plus the fact that this might be the first year in about 5 that they finish with fewer than 4 losses (by the way, that loss was to TEXAS)

quote:


Notre Dame



Who?
This post was edited on 11/15/10 at 2:36 am
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 4:37 am to
quote:

THE elite programs in the country are:

Alabama
Michigan
Nebraska
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Oklahoma
Penn State
Texas
USC

That's it boys. Everybody else is at least one step down.



If you had asked this question in 1980 you would be right. However, in 2010, you simply have to add Florida and LSU to that list. Does it really make sense that what is currently the most dominant conference in the history of college football would only have 1 team in the most dominant list?
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 4:47 am to
The dividing point in historic and modern football has to be the rise of Miami. Any fan of college football history should really see the 30 for 30 on Miami. Pre-Miami, no schools recruited problem kids on a regular basis. Miami said frick it, we have the best athletes in the nation living within a 100 mile radius of us and character will not prevent us from putting them on a football team.

When Miami did that in the early 80's college football changed forever. They dominated teams with inner city, often gang connected kids and then FSU started doing it. When those two "nobody" schools began destroying the big boys, the traditional programs had to go after questionable recruits themselves to keep up.

And we wonder why teams like Florida and Georgia have roughly the same arrest rate on their football teams as there is in inner city Detroit.

Another big change was ESPN and the ability for more than just a handful of schools to be shown on tv. No longer did a kid from Louisiana have to go to Nebraska to get on tv. He could stay and play for LSU and get on tv. This is why Notre Dame is not as big of a deal anymore. Anything they can offer, 30 other schools can now offer whereas that was not the case 30 years ago.
Posted by e2drummer
Member since Jun 2009
4221 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 4:51 am to
Holy shite! This thread didn't devolve into a Cam Newton hate-fest?

You guys actually talked about FOOTBALL?!?!?!?

How did such a rational thread happen on here?
Posted by tod
Cullman County
Member since Nov 2010
20 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 6:55 am to
Of course they are. That is why 53 years has elapsed since their last NC...
Posted by ellis1975
Atlanta
Member since Apr 2007
1058 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 8:45 am to
Who here thinks AU gives a shyt about being considered elite? The media has a hard on for some programs, always have and always will. Notre Dame is always listed as elite. ND is some pre garbage. They have not been elite in over a decade. At what point does a school lose their "eliteness"?

Most of these programs became elite before the 95 scholarship rule. Bama became elite when the had Bear Bryant as their HC, you know, the coach that is 1 of the main reasons we currently have so many rules in place about recruiting.

What you have is a bunch of schools that once ruled CFB because they were able to gather top talent consistantly. USC has their Rose Bowl deal, I'm sure that had nothing to do with the media helping to influence their "eliteness".

Give evryone a break about who is or isn't elite. AU would beat the shyt out of just about everybody on every list of elite schools that have been listed here. You don't get extra points to start a game because you are elite. USC cheats just as much if not more than AU so maybe that helps them to maintain their elite level.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 9:42 am to
quote:

When Miami did that in the early 80's college football changed forever. They dominated teams with inner city, often gang connected kids and then FSU started doing it. When those two "nobody" schools began destroying the big boys, the traditional programs had to go after questionable recruits themselves to keep up.

And we wonder why teams like Florida and Georgia have roughly the same arrest rate on their football teams as there is in inner city Detroit.

I'd say it's because of lax discipline. Butch Davis put together a pro-bowl roster for the 2001 squad and I don't think they had a bunch of off the field issues. Coker allowed the program to go to hell, but that doesn't mean you can't have talented kids who can behave.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 9:43 am to
I'm still not at all sure why Penn State is on so many lists. They have no outright conference titles since 1994, and their two co-titles came in years where Michigan sucked. Other than that, Penn State's tenure in the Big 10 has consisted of little more than serving as Lloyd Carr's punching bag. Other than a couple of national titles in a 5 year span more than 20 years ago, they're really not any more impressive than Wisconsin post joining the Big 10.
This post was edited on 11/15/10 at 9:47 am
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 9:43 am to
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter