Started By
Message
locked post

First Battle of Civil War was Battle of Blackjack b/t Missouri & Kansas Forces

Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:54 am
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:54 am
The Battle of Blackjack was fought in Kansas in 1856 between northern abolitionists and southern border ruffians (ie. Missourians) five years before the Battle of Fort Sumter.

Many credible and respected historians credit the Battle of Blackjack (not the Battle of Fort Sumter) as the first battle of the American Civil War, or rather, the first battle in the War of Northern Aggression.

You can go ahead and thank Missouri for lighting the powder keg against the northern marauders. You can thank us for setting the stage for secession.

You're welcome.


NOTE: Mark Twain once upon a time famously remarked, "The Missouri black flagging ruffians never formally surrendered unlike the Confederates. In Missouri, surrender occurred when a native son was decapitated by the sword or axe. Only then could a Missourian be considered 'surrendered'."
This post was edited on 10/25/13 at 4:19 pm
Posted by TabledTiger
Venice
Member since Apr 2013
2251 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:54 am to
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22365 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:54 am to
wrong board
Posted by troywew
Member since Nov 2010
2510 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:55 am to
quote:

War of Northern Aggression.



Now you catching on.
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:55 am to
What was the issue? Were the redlegs caught card counting? The bastards.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25854 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:57 am to
quote:

The Battle of Blackjack was fought in Kansas in 1856 between northern abolitionists and southern (Missouri) border ruffians five years before the Battle of Fort Sumter.


Sorry brah, no body cares what happened between Mizzou and Kansas before, during, or after the Civil War.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:01 pm to
Historians care enough to designate the Battle of Blackjack the first battle of the Cival War.

That's pretty significant.
Posted by TabledTiger
Venice
Member since Apr 2013
2251 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Historians care enough to designate the Battle of Blackjack the first battle of the Cival War. That's pretty significant.


Why don't you worry about Clowney's arse obliterating another one of your QB's instead of posting this worthless shite on a Friday....
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:02 pm to
how long must we fight this war? or are you pandering? if pandering, i had no idea most people gave a shite about it nowdays. i guess some southeners are still looking for the relatives of the yankees that stole their great, great, great grandmothers silver but most southeners ancestors didn't even have any fricking silver.
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:03 pm to
Clowney who? What?

Are you talking about Halloween?
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25854 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Historians care enough to designate the Battle of Blackjack the first battle of the Cival War. That's pretty significant.


quote:

Result

Free-Stater victory


Congrats on the L. I guess historians will always have to credit the Battle of Fort Sumter as the first Southern victory then.
Posted by kage
ATL
Member since Feb 2010
4068 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:07 pm to
Y'all are still a bunch of yankees.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

What was the issue? Were the redlegs caught card counting? The bastards


and to top it off, the assholes didn't like tennessee whiskey.
Posted by Tom Sawyer
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2012
1001 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Y'all are still a bunch of yankees.



bunch of northern yankee meth-head peckerwoods
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

tennessee whiskey



They'll kill you in TN for calling it whiskey...
Posted by Crimson Forever
Pace, Florida
Member since Sep 2013
432 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by dlc83
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
1829 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:15 pm to
Nothing wrong with a little history lesson on a Friday afternoon. The Mizzu/Kansas border war was brutal, particularly for innocent families. If you read about it, you might find it interesting. Certainly, it was a foreshadowing of bad things to come in the Civil War.



Posted by troywew
Member since Nov 2010
2510 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

but most southeners ancestors didn't even have any fricking silver.


98+% didn't have squat.
Posted by blacknblu
Member since Nov 2011
10276 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:18 pm to
Killz - nice thread
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:20 pm to
dlc83

quote:

Nothing wrong with a little history lesson on a Friday afternoon




quote:

The Mizzu/Kansas border war was brutal, particularly for innocent families. If you read about it, you might find it interesting



Come on, man...I'm from Missouri. We grow up reading and learning about the Missouri/Kansas border war. We live and breathe it even to this day.

We know the TRUTH about those frickers from Kansas. Not the revised version that the goverment prints in history books to fit an agenda and specific narrative.
This post was edited on 10/25/13 at 12:54 pm
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter