Started By
Message
re: Corso & Kirk pick LSU to win the SEC
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:11 am to BayouBengals03
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:11 am to BayouBengals03
I know they were highly ranked coming into college but don't you kinda see a similarity between that guy homering about our young highly touted secondary being better than LSU and you loling at him saying the RB situation is close? He's excited because we have a lot of talent in the defensive backfield. You are excited over your young talent in the offensive backfield.
1
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:20 am to Patton
quote:
I know they were highly ranked coming into college but don't you kinda see a similarity between that guy homering about our young highly touted secondary being better than LSU and you loling at him saying the RB situation is close?
He literally used Harris (an incoming true freshman) as part of the reasoning why the advantage would swing back to Alabama.
You asked me what LSU has in the backfield, so I responded. Sure, I'm excited about our young talent in the backfield, but that's not the reason.
The reason basically everyone thinks LSU has a better backfield is because we have Fournette, and Drake is coming off an injury. On top of that, Fournette is considered the better back, anyway.
And LSU has really good, proven talent in the secondary. A secondary that was the best in the conference BY FAR last season.
There's a big difference.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:21 am to BayouBengals03
quote:
There's a big difference
I have three percent battery so let's just agree to disagree.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:24 am to lsu711
quote:
The last 2015 game that I would pick as a barometer for 2016 success is a bowl game
Unless it's an injury depleted Ole Miss team... In that case, it matters.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:27 am to Patton
quote:
I have three percent battery so let's just agree to disagree.
Then you're just being a homer.
You're saying I'm excited about OUR running backs because they're young, contradicting the fact that the reason he said the advantage would swing to Alabama is because of YOUR freshman running back.
It's just silly.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:31 am to BayouBengals03
Nvm miss read post
This post was edited on 8/30/15 at 11:32 am
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:32 am to Patton
All I'm saying is that I don't believe that saying the RB situation being close is lol worthy
This post was edited on 8/30/15 at 11:33 am
Posted on 8/30/15 at 11:33 am to Patton
We'll find out soon enough.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 12:01 pm to Patton
Idk, call it 18-22 TDs and 2200-2500 yards and I think LSU would be rollin'
I don't remember Mett's 2012 stats, but something like that is all this offense really needs this year. Fournette and co just need the threat of a passing game.
I don't remember Mett's 2012 stats, but something like that is all this offense really needs this year. Fournette and co just need the threat of a passing game.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 12:06 pm to Patton
quote:In my opinion, what separates LSU's running back situation from anyone else's is the depth. In a lot of ways, I think it's going to be similar to what UGA had last year; if you say Fournette=Gurley, then a lot of reports are placing Guice=Chubb.
All I'm saying is that I don't believe that saying the RB situation being close is lol worthy
Guice has come into camp and absolutely has been lighting it up. If Fournette wasn't here, Guice would be the sure starter.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 1:57 pm to Patton
quote:
So does LSU have a better front seven or is the margin between them and Bama just not wi
Yeah bama has the edge but up to this point their front 7 isn't this immovable object or stacked with productive players.
Posted on 8/30/15 at 2:00 pm to JohnForney
Because of LSU's players. Chavis hasn't been there long enough to weed the pussies out of A&M
Posted on 8/30/15 at 8:55 pm to BHSU Only
Desmond has picked Michigan St., A&M, Stanford, and Virginia Tech to win their conferences. He might be right, but as of now I think he's lost his damn mind.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News