re: Chubb vs Fournette after Week 1

quote:

---

when was LF in a reasonable position to score a TD?

---

Chubb scored from 55 yards out. How close is "reasonable" for LF?

quote:

---

No. I would honestly say using 2015 season worth of stats, is actually more valuable than using 1 game in 2016.

---

So you're gonna sit right there and tell me that statistics that happened last week, in 2016, with all of 2016's players/coaches/teams/games/results...are LESS relevant now (in 2016) than stats accumulated from september-december of 2015?

Gotamighty

quote:

---

Chubb scored from 55 yards out. How close is "reasonable" for LF?

---

And LF had a long reception that allowed our pitiful fricking offense to score its only 7 points of the day. So, if after LF was the reason we got inside the 10 would have gotten to score, instead of someone else, it magically makes it that much better?

It is just so frustrating. If we sat down on a sunday having beers watching football, we would all pretty much agree with the each other. But on this site we have to be dickheads.

I just dont honestly see how anyone can say Chubb is better than LF, or LF is better than Chubb

Look up my post history, I was losing my mind on LSU fans last year when they said LF was far greater, when he was simply getting a heavier workload. It is asinine.

quote:

---

It really isnt that fricking ignorant if their defensive rankings remain similar to last year you frick stick

---

No, it still is quite ignorant.

quote:

---

You dont have to act so superior. Newslfash, you making your username RB10 doesnt mean you know shite more than anyone else

---

If you honestly believe the shite you're spewing it's not an act, you're a moron.

quote:

---

So you're gonna sit right there and tell me that statistics that happened last week, in 2016, with all of 2016's players/coaches/teams/games/results...are LESS relevant now (in 2016) than stats accumulated from september-december of 2015?

Gotamighty

---

Yes. I am saying using 14 games in 2015, is actually more accurate than using 1 game in 2016, even when taking into consideration players and coaches leaving.

If you broke it down, and reviewed previous seasons statistical rankings after week 1, you would see more movement than when comparing it to the prior year

Anything to keep LF on top...

quote:

---

I started typing out a response to you, then realized somebody who thinks 2015 stats are more relevant than 2016 when it relates to the 2016 season isn't worth the energy.

---

If you compare the final top 10 2014 defensive rankings to how they finished in 2015, you get 4 matches.

If you use the rankings after week 1 in 2015, you get only 2 teams that actually match with the final top 10 in 2015..........



So maybe you should stop being such an arrogant dick


LINK

quote:

---

If you compare the final top 10 2014 defensive rankings to how they finished in 2015, you get 4 matches.

If you use the rankings after week 1 in 2015, you get only 2 teams that actually match with the final top 10 in 2015..........



So maybe you should stop being such an arrogant dick


LINK

---

And if you do the same for the season before, you get 3 matches using my way, and 1 using yours........


So, my way seems to be a more accurate predictor at who will remain a top defense

Leonard has a sliding scale when he plays halfway decent defenses, dude.

quote:

---

And Chubb is returning from an injury.

---

True. Wisconsin's defense is far superior to North Carolina. Also true. Anyone who believes Chubb is a better back than Fournette is entitled to their opinion, including Fournette himself who's said for 3 years that he thinks Chubb is better. Those who believe the two are fairly equal or that Fournette has a slight edge aren't crazy for thinking it. That's true as well.