Started By
Message

re: Chubb vs Fournette after Week 1

Posted on 9/7/16 at 2:54 pm to
Posted by LewDawg
Member since May 2009
75242 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

NeverToYield
Holy shite
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

140 yards and no TDs is not up to his standards, and that's a fact.



Its not, but that is a very good rushing defense and he had 6 YPC at 140 yards. That is damn solid for 99% of running backs.

We had like 13 plays on offense in the 1st half.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

That is damn solid for 99% of running backs.


This is the thing though. He and Chubb are in that 1%, so don't get made when people point out that his performance was not great.

Like WG just said, it's a testament to him that 140 yards can be considered struggling.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10970 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

Funny how things have a way of working out.
Yes. It's so funny that I am now suffering from a fit of apoplectic hilarity. If it becomes much more funny, I will have to save some of the laughter for the End Times, when humor will be in very short supply. Now that I think of it, we should all probably just eliminate any thought of frivolous disposition for the entirety of the rest of time, for you have illustrated the very zenith of all wit and comedy through your insightful and pungent observations and analysis. We are all grateful indeed.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:00 pm to
Let's be honest, Wiscy is a middle of the road defense against an SEC schedule. Alabama destroyed them last season with Henry averaging like 12 YPC.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95013 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

o don't get made when people point out that his performance was not great.
Im sorry. When you have 176 total yards against the returning #2 total defense in the NCAA, and 138 of those yards are rushing against the #4 ranked rushing defense, that is a great performance for anyone.

To expect more is just not logical really
Posted by GoldenDawg
Dawg in Exile
Member since Oct 2013
19087 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:01 pm to
Chubb is better, but it's an unfair comparison. Chubb has at least one knee that's been completely rebuilt, while LF7 has to struggle along with the same old knees he's always had.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95013 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Wiscy is a middle of the road defense against an SEC schedule.
Because the sec is such a tough offensive juggernaut
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

To expect more is just not logical really


Why do you keep ignoring touchdowns? 140 yards with a scores becomes a good day.

140 yards without one is nothing to go crazy about.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

Because the sec is such a tough offensive juggernaut

Well some of us are. But I guess you can help me make my point.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86463 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

against the returning #2 total defense in the NCAA, and 138 of those yards are rushing against the #4 ranked rushing defense


can we please stop referencing last year's stats? I mean last year UGA had the #1 pass defense in America but I don't see anyone pumping that up this year.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95013 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

can we please stop referencing last year's stats?
What more do we have to go on? The rankings on total defense and rush defense usually stay pretty consistent between years
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95013 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Why do you keep ignoring touchdowns?
So LF needed to score 50 or 60 yard td runs for it to be a good game? We were inside the redzone one time thanks to LF having a long reception. Our longest drive was 49 yards.


I have always said tds are a horrible way to judge receivers and running backs.

It values a 1 yd td reception more than a 45 yard reception that put you on the 1
This post was edited on 9/7/16 at 3:10 pm
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:09 pm to
Last week the only reason Wiscy had a great Defense last season was now standing on LSUs sideline. FF to today, Wiscy is now full of 4 and 5 stars.
Posted by DawgGone
Member since Oct 2014
1109 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:11 pm to
My unbiased opinion on Chubb vs L7

L7 ------------------- is Faster
L7 ------------------ is a better receiver
L7------------------- plays on a shitty offense
L7------------------- is a better blocker
L7------------------- not as likely to get hurt

All that said, Chubb will probably end up All SEC or All American ahead of L7. However, on draft night, he will be the 1st back taken.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

I have always said tds are a horrible way to judge receivers and running backs.

It values a 1 yd td reception more than a 45 yard reception that put you on the 1


Solid argument when the RB in question isn't a 3 down running back.

Keep acting like touchdowns aren't relevant. I'll just start ignoring your opinion because it's dumb.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Last week the only reason Wiscy had a great Defense last season was now standing on LSUs sideline


He wasn't a big reason?


quote:

FF to today, Wiscy is now full of 4 and 5 stars.


Link to one person saying this.


Please terry, stop making shite up.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95013 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Keep acting like touchdowns aren't relevant.
I never said they werent. But in your fair noble opinion that is so valuable master master, when was LF in a reasonable position to score a TD?
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86463 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

What more do we have to go on?


One week's worth of stats. It's not much, but it's 100% more relevant than anything that happened in september of 2015 wouldn't ya say?

Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 9/7/16 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

I never said they werent. But in your fair noble opinion that is so valuable master master, when was LF in a reasonable position to score a TD?


Jesus dude, I never said he SHOULD have scored. That doesn't change the fact that a touchdown turns a decent game into a good one. All you have to do is look at how people view McCaffrey after his game vs. how Fournette is being viewed. Similar yardage, yet McCaffrey is still in the top 3 for the heisman. I wonder why.....

Seriously, your argument that 180 yards and no TDs is just as good as Chubb's 220 yards and 2 TDs is fricking ignorant.

This post was edited on 9/7/16 at 3:18 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter