Started By
Message
re: Bama's Dee Milliner Potential 2013 #1 Overall Pick?
Posted on 3/4/13 at 10:51 pm to Bench McElroy
Posted on 3/4/13 at 10:51 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
It's a foregone conclusion that Kansas City will trade the pick. They might not get a ton of value in return but there's no way they'll keep the pick.
who will trade for it?
1
Posted on 3/4/13 at 10:56 pm to adammwilson
quote:
who will trade for it?
A really desperate team that needs a QB. That could be a number of teams like the Jets, Cardinals or Bills.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:01 pm to Bench McElroy
No need to trade up when they'll likely be there when they pick.
Not a very sexy situation for KC, Reid may just have to make a buddy buddy deal with a friend if he wants to get out of it.
Not a very sexy situation for KC, Reid may just have to make a buddy buddy deal with a friend if he wants to get out of it.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:08 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
A really desperate team that needs a QB. That could be a number of teams like the Jets, Cardinals or Bills.
Is Geno really worth trading up for?
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:11 pm to MagillaGuerilla
This year's draft reminds me a lot of the 2005 NFL Draft when Alex Smith went #1 overall. The two best players in the draft ended up being a small school sleeper whose stock skyrocketed after lighting up the combine (DeMarcus Ware) and a QB who went from a potential #1 overall pick to plummeting to the #24 pick (Aaron Rodgers). I won't be surprised if we see something similar to that in this year's draft.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:13 pm to adammwilson
quote:
Is Geno really worth trading up for?
Apparently the Cardinals are dead set on drafting a QB in the first round. People are saying that there's no way they'll pass up Matt Barkley if he's available at the #7 pick. I can easily see them being a team that overpays for Geno.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:13 pm to adammwilson
quote:
Is Geno really worth trading up for?
Hell no.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:14 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Apparently the Cardinals are dead set on drafting a QB in the first round.
Geno could drop to their pick if they sit tight.
quote:
People are saying that there's no way they'll pass up Matt Barkley if he's available at the #7 pick.
Barkley isn't a good fit for their offense though.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:14 pm to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Hell no.
agreed. He doesn't impress me at all.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:15 pm to Bench McElroy
Yeah, I'm sure people will take both of those guys way higher than they should. I mean, I don't know if I can blame them. It doesn't make sense for the team itself, but for a coach or GM that only has so many years to make things work, it's a risk that they might have to take. Unless they like one of the other QBs they can get later. That's probably what I'd do.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:19 pm to thefloydian
quote:
for a coach or GM that only has so many years to make things work, it's a risk that they might have to take. Unless they like one of the other QBs they can get later.
At the same time though if you are desperate for a QB and miss the pick then you lose your job.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:21 pm to adammwilson
quote:
At the same time though if you are desperate for a QB and miss the pick then you lose your job.
You'll lose your job anyway if you keep starting whoever Arizona has at QB.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:23 pm to thefloydian
quote:
You'll lose your job anyway if you keep starting whoever Arizona has at QB.
They are about to trade for a QB I would guess. Maybe Foles?
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:24 pm to adammwilson
quote:
They are about to trade for a QB I would guess. Maybe Foles?
I haven't been paying attention. But there aren't enough QBs to go around. One of those desperate teams is going to have to draft someone or keep starting their own terrible QB.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:25 pm to thefloydian
quote:
there aren't enough QBs to go around. One of those desperate teams is going to have to draft someone or keep starting their own terrible QB.
Depends if you see Foles/Cassell/Flynn as legit options, even if for a short time.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:27 pm to adammwilson
quote:
Depends if you see Foles/Cassell/Flynn as legit options, even if for a short time.
I really don't think a team can start the year with Matt Cassell as the #1 QB.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:29 pm to thefloydian
quote:
I really don't think a team can start the year with Matt Cassell as the #1 QB.
I agree but if they add competition through the draft....
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:30 pm to thefloydian
quote:
I haven't been paying attention. But there aren't enough QBs to go around. One of those desperate teams is going to have to draft someone or keep starting their own terrible QB.
There's still some solid QBs left to be traded. Flynn and Foles could be big time trade bait leading up to the draft.
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:31 pm to adammwilson
When you think about it not that many teams really need a QB.
Chiefs
Bills
Jets?
Browns?
Cardinals
Eagles?
Chiefs
Bills
Jets?
Browns?
Cardinals
Eagles?
Posted on 3/4/13 at 11:32 pm to adammwilson
quote:
They are about to trade for a QB I would guess. Maybe Foles?
They are looking at Matt Cassel, who is a WCO QB.
If they are going after a WCO QB, Barkley is actually a decent fit for them.
Page 7 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News