Started By
Message
Posted on 6/1/16 at 6:09 pm to Mister Tee
Auburn should be in the ACC.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 6:44 pm to Mister Tee
quote:
We've finished dead first quite a few. LSU knows about this
It's been while, but yes we have. Have an upvote.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 6:56 pm to Mister Tee
quote:
first quite a few.
Few is correct
Posted on 6/1/16 at 6:56 pm to Mister Tee
Dup
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 6/1/16 at 8:09 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
It's not the best for all involved. It's the best for Auburn,
It's best for Auburn and doesn't effect anything but the UT/Vandy & UT/UK series. But which would you rather watch AU/UF or UT/Vandy? Exactly.
quote:
and more specifically you because you don't want to make 1 long road trip a year.
You're confusing me with somebody else.
quote:
All rivalries are intact.
Except they aren't. You're new to the conference so I wouldn't expect you to know that
quote:
I don't want to switch divisions
You people don't even read before jumping in arguments do y'all? I'm not switching Mizzou. Y'all are still in the East.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 6/1/16 at 8:23 pm to Weagle25
quote:
quote:
It's not the best for all involved. It's the best for Auburn,
It's best for Auburn and doesn't effect anything but the UT/Vandy & UT/UK series. But which would you rather watch AU/UF or UT/Vandy? Exactly.
How about asking Tenn., Vandy, & Ky. that...esp. since you want to end the Tn./Vandy in-state game, but NOT the Ala./Aub. in-state game.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 8:25 pm to Tillman
quote:
Auburn should be in the SEC East. by Tillman
i don't think SEC could get any NC schools and VA schools in the ACC, G Tech, or Clemson.
Let's see when their GOR is over. I wouldn't be surprised if some are already waiting on that date to bolt to the SEC.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 8:33 pm to southernboisb
It keeps all big rivalries and rejuvenates one. I can't take you seriously if you think keeping the UT/Vandy is better than rejuvenating the AU/UF series
Posted on 6/1/16 at 8:48 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Auburn fans seem to be the only ones bitching about it. Y'all come off as scared.
We only 'come off as scared' with people that are so new to the SEC that they don't understand our traditional rivals are Florida and Tennessee.
I want to play them again. I don't care about playing Texas A&M and freaking Arkansas.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 6/1/16 at 8:55 pm to PatDyesPants
quote:
traditional rivals
quote:
Tennessee.
No they aren't.
A 35 year consecutive series where they'd only play you in Birmingham for most of it?
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:32 pm to southernboisb
quote:
i don't think SEC could get any NC schools and VA schools in the ACC, G Tech, or Clemson.
Let's see when their GOR is over. I wouldn't be surprised if some are already waiting on that date to bolt to the SEC.
i think there would be a backlash from alumni of ACC schools if the historical ACC programs leave for other conferences. and these schools arent going to leave a conference associated with academics to go to SEC.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 6/2/16 at 6:01 am to Weagle25
quote:
Auburn should be in the SEC East. by Weagle25
It keeps all big rivalries and rejuvenates one. I can't take you seriously if you think keeping the UT/Vandy is better than rejuvenating the AU/UF series
YOU admitted you're doing "what's best for Auburn" by ending rivalries for 3 other schools....& I'M the 1 not to be taken seriously?
& yes, I think an in-state rivalry trumps a Fl./Aub. game. Why not dump the IB & play Fl.?
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 6:03 am
Posted on 6/2/16 at 8:16 am to Tillman
quote:Hell, we've already got a Clemson...only without the lake.
i don't think SEC could get any NC schools and VA schools in the ACC, G Tech, or Clemson.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 9:30 am to PatDyesPants
quote:
We only 'come off as scared' with people that are so new to the SEC that they don't understand our traditional rivals are Florida and Tennessee.
I'm not new to the SEC, and Auburn fans are coming off scared to me.
And as far as this AU-UT thing, it looks like Auburn has played Tennessee only like 2-3 more games than they've played against LSU.
quote:
I want to play them again. I don't care about playing Texas A&M and freaking Arkansas.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 9:34 am to WildTchoupitoulas
If competitive balance is the main issue, it would probably mean realignment every so often as the powers do shift.
I think preserving rivalries and geography should be a priority before balance.
I think preserving rivalries and geography should be a priority before balance.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:48 am to RazorHawk
quote:
I think preserving rivalries and geography should be a priority before balance.
Auburn fans are just trying too hard to make every team in the east their "historic rivals". UGA and UF? Okay, however, using the same criteria, Alabama would have just as much justification to go the east as Auburn. "But, but, Tennessee, Georgia and Vandy are our traditional rivals..."
I think Auburn fans are scared of Arkansas evening up the series on them.
And, after all, where would Auburn be without their historic rivalry with State (89 games and counting - #2 all-time for Auburn)?
Posted on 6/2/16 at 10:58 am to southernboisb
quote:
YOU admitted you're doing "what's best for Auburn" by ending rivalries for 3 other schools.
Ending two rivalries that are pretty meaningless to add one with meaning. Vandy barely has fans and UK is a basketball school.
Take a fan of a random school not in the SEC. Which are they more likely to watch?
Also I didn't say I was doing what's best for Auburn necessarily. I said doing this would be best for the conference and just so happens that it's also best for Auburn
quote:
yes, I think an in-state rivalry trumps a Fl./Aub. game. Why not dump the IB & play Fl.?
Because that game has ratings. Compare it to the ratings of the UT/Vandy game
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 11:00 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News