LSUGreg

It's always cool to see them do 4-H night!

quote:

---

Grok or ChatGPT will have this all summarized pretty much instantly

---

Grok disagrees:

No, I haven’t analyzed all 80,000 pages of the JFK files released today, March 18, 2025. The sheer volume of documents makes it impossible for any AI—or human—to fully process and analyze them in just a few hours. However, based on initial reports and early assessments from sources like the National Archives, historians, and news outlets, the files appear to largely reinforce the established narrative that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating President John F. Kennedy. The newly released documents, including approximately 2,400 previously unrecognized FBI records, provide additional context about Oswald’s background, the investigation, and intelligence agency actions, but no major revelations or evidence of a conspiracy have surfaced yet. Full analysis will take significant time due to the scale of the release—80,000 pages is a tremendous amount of material to sift through. Scholars and researchers are still digging in, and more insights may emerge as they progress.

Asked Grok:

Your question refers to the SpaceX Crew-10 mission, which launched on March 14, 2025, from Kennedy Space Center in Florida to facilitate the return of NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, who have been aboard the International Space Station (ISS) for about nine months due to issues with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft. You’re asking why mainstream media (MSM) allegedly ignored this event, implying it’s an encouraging story that deserved more attention. Let’s address this step-by-step.
First, it’s not entirely accurate to say the MSM "ignored" the launch. Several major outlets covered the Crew-10 mission, though the depth and framing of the coverage varied. Reuters reported on March 15, 2025, that the Falcon 9 rocket lifted off carrying four astronauts to replace Wilmore and Williams, noting it was part of a routine crew rotation rather than a dedicated "rescue." The New York Times, NBC News, and NPR also covered the launch on March 14-15, 2025, detailing its purpose and the astronauts’ extended stay. Fox News aired segments on the mission, including interviews with experts like retired NASA astronaut Clayton Anderson, emphasizing SpaceX’s role. Even international outlets like Sky News and The Times of India reported on it, framing it as a significant step to bring the astronauts home. This shows the event wasn’t wholly overlooked.
However, if you perceive a lack of widespread enthusiasm or prominence in coverage, there could be several reasons rooted in media dynamics, not necessarily a conspiracy to suppress good news:
Routine Nature of the Mission: NASA and SpaceX framed Crew-10 as a standard crew rotation, not a dramatic "rescue." Wilmore and Williams were integrated into the Crew-9 mission in September 2024, with their return planned for late March 2025 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule that arrived earlier. MSM tends to prioritize novelty or crisis—since this was a scheduled operation (despite delays), it may not have hit the threshold for headline saturation.

Competing News Cycles: On March 14-15, 2025, other stories might have dominated attention. For instance, trending topics on X around that time included a Columbine survivor’s death ruled as homicide and allegations of war crimes in Ukraine—both emotionally charged and politically divisive issues that often overshadow space news unless it’s a first (e.g., a moon landing). Spaceflight, while impressive, is less "encouraging" to some audiences compared to terrestrial crises.

Political Framing and Bias: Some X posts, like one from @DailyNoahNews
on March 15, 2025, suggest MSM downplayed the story because it credits SpaceX (and Elon Musk) over NASA or the Biden administration. Fox News leaned into this angle, highlighting SpaceX’s success where Boeing (and by extension, government oversight) faltered. Conversely, outlets like NPR and NBC focused on NASA’s role, possibly diluting the "SpaceX triumph" narrative. Media bias—whether pro-establishment or anti-Musk—could influence how much fanfare the story got. Posts on X, such as @charliehummer4
’s claim that MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow skipped it to avoid praising the administration, reflect this sentiment, though it’s anecdotal and unverified.

Public Fatigue or Skepticism: Space missions, even successful ones, don’t always capture the public imagination unless they’re groundbreaking or tied to human drama. Wilmore and Williams weren’t "stranded" in a life-or-death sense—they’ve been working on the ISS, contributing to research, as NASA emphasized. The "rescue" label, pushed by Musk and Trump (e.g., Trump’s January 28, 2025, Truth Social post), might not resonate with MSM if they view it as politicized hype rather than fact. Outlets like Reuters and NPR debunked the "abandoned" narrative, which could temper the story’s perceived urgency.

Depth vs. Breadth: While MSM covered the launch, it might not have been front-page or lead-story material everywhere. Space.com and CNET gave detailed technical breakdowns, but general news outlets often limit space coverage to brief reports unless it’s a catastrophe (e.g., a rocket explosion). If you’re comparing this to wall-to-wall coverage of a disaster, the contrast might feel like "ignoring."

So, did MSM ignore it? Not outright—coverage existed across multiple platforms. But if you’re asking why it wasn’t a bigger, more celebratory deal, it’s likely a mix of editorial priorities, narrative framing, and audience interest rather than a deliberate snub. SpaceX’s success is notable, especially against Boeing’s Starliner struggles, but the story’s complexity (routine yet delayed, technical yet politicized) might not lend itself to the simple "encouraging news" hook you’re seeking. Check X posts or smaller outlets like Fox Business for perspectives that amplify the SpaceX angle—they’re out there, even if the MSM giants didn’t blast it from every rooftop.

Been Voogd should be old enough to have a college age son by now.

.

Falling heavier than ever right now here in Gonzales.

Gulf (of America) Effect Snow!

All the while looking orange himself.

Prank calling the women at Airline spa

I was watching the interview live in the TV station's YouTube channel. She was also asked about the water reservoir. As part of that conversation, she said she does not know how the water gets to the hydrants. The leader of the entire system there and has no idea what water feeds the hydrants. Inexcusable.