Favorite team: | Ole Miss ![]() |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 3649 |
Registered on: | 12/20/2005 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Who are the top 3 FB coaches in your school's history?
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 4:00 pm
quote:
Already at #2 after 2 seasons and a 13-12 record? Interesting..
:lol:
Yep.
It is really going to be interesting to see how they deal with Petrino's failure and his inability to even match Nutt's record at Arkansas, much less exceed it.....
Right now, they are still in denial and still telling themselves that Nutt was the cause of all their mediocrity, when, in reality, he probably did as well at Arkansas as anyone is going to be able to do, assuming they remain in the SEC......
re: Who are the top 3 FB coaches in your school's history?
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 3:55 pm
quote:
Shug - longest tenure, MNC, most wins
Dye - dominant run in 80's
Tubbs - good run in 2000's, undefeated season
Seriously?
Shug was never a great coach, in my opinion--just a decent one in an era when coaches rarely got fired unless they were really, really bad. Dye and Tubs were much more talented, IMO.....
re: Who are the top 3 FB coaches in your school's history?
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 3:52 pm
quote:
1. Cholly Mac
2. Paul Dietzel
3. Miles
Still can't face the truth, huh?
:lol:
re: Who are the top 3 FB coaches in your school's history?
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 3:51 pm
quote:
3) Mark Richt
Well, if assistants count, would you believe we once had Bill Parcells on our staff?
re: Who are the top 3 FB coaches in your school's history?
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 3:49 pm
1) Vaught
2) Tuberville
3) Nutt (pretty sad, isn't it?)
2) Tuberville
3) Nutt (pretty sad, isn't it?)
re: College Football Live talking about conference expansion
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 2:48 pm
The SEC is not going to expand and none of the teams who are currently members are going to leave.
Next.
Next.
re: How much longer will Nutt be around
Posted by NJReb on 5/7/10 at 2:45 pm
quote:
It's OM. If he wins them 8 or 9 games most years they will be content. If he ever gets them to Atlanta like he did for Arky, they will name the field after him.
Sadly, unless there is an unprecedented change in the fan culture and the culture of the athletics department, your statement is dead accurate......
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 4:36 pm
quote:
They need us. We don't need them
Well, given that the original post in this thread had to do with resentment over them being ranked #2 in pre-season polls, I am not sure that is really the case, any more.......
Look, as I said, I don't think their ranking is justified, myself, but I also don't think teams that refuse to schedule them have any right at all to complain about that ranking.....that's all....
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 4:30 pm
quote:
My beef with them is that they are given a free pass to the BCS.
I wouldn't say that. If they lose even one in-conference game, they are toast.....and I don't care how good a team is or how crappy a conference is, it is very hard to win every single game, year after year.
So if they keep winning every game they play, then it is hard to justify holding them down, particularly if they are doing all they can to schedule teams from BCS conferences (which they apparently are)........
I just don't see how that constitutes a "free ride".....
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 4:09 pm
quote:
Why should SEC teams do that? Our schedules are hard enough as it is with having to play anywhere from 3-5 ranked opponents a year just from in house.
You are contradicting yourself, aren't you? If they are really just an overrated sack of shite, like you are implying they are, then it should be no more difficult to beat them than it is to beat any other team from a second-tier conference.....and there should therefore be no reluctance to scheduling them....
Your reluctance, however, suggests that you believe they really are pretty good and you are afraid you might lose the game, especially on the road.....and if that is the case, it suggests that their ranking is deserved.....
Again, you can't have your cake and eat it, too......
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 4:01 pm
quote:
I bet you could have puked a lot last season with the Ole Miss OOC schedule.
Yeah, most Ole Miss OOC schedules make me puke.
That said, we have had home-and-homes with Texas Tech, Missouri, and Wake Forest (when they were good) in recent years, we had a home-and-home with Arkansas every year for the decade before they joined the SEC, and we have future home-and-homes with Clemson, Georgia Tech, and Texas, so things are at least not as bad as they used to be.....
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 3:51 pm
quote:
I won't have a single shred of respect for Boise until they adopt the Fresno State mentality- anywhere, anyone, anytime
They DO have that mentality. Have you even been listening?
Either offer to play them or stop bitching about their weak schedule....you can't have it both ways......
And those losses you cited in the early 2000's were before they started being ranked really high......
When I see evidence that 4 or 5 SEC schools have offered them home-and-homes but were turned down, then I will go along with you, but until I do, you don't have a case.......
I personally am so sick and tired of this holier-than-thou attitude from SEC fans that I could puke......most SEC schools play no more than 1 game per year against any good OOC teams and then they want to be given automatic berths in the NC game simply because they were the best team in their own conference.......
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 3:41 pm
quote:
but they aren't scheduling to their potential.
Like any other team that plays in a conference, they have only so many slots for OOC games.
They filled two of those with Oregon State and Virginia Tech....and I don't doubt that they tried to fill the others with BCS teams, as well.....
What more do you want them to do?
re: Jamarcus Released by Raiders
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 3:36 pm
quote:
Warren Moon?
Fair point, although he did not enter the NFL until late in his career, having had years of "practice" in the CFL before his debut.....
Regardless, three is not a lot, when you consider that there are over 30 teams in the NFL and that more than 70% of the players in the league overall are black.....
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 3:33 pm
quote:
And I'll be sure to call Hammy up and ask him to remove Nebraska and Oklahoma from our upcoming schedules so the boys can go play against a WAC team in Idaho.
Well, that WAC team from Idaho did do a number on the Oklahoma you referred to, didn't they?
And trust me, if they are ranked #1 or #@ by season's end and don't get invited to the BCS championship game, Congress will intervene......Bank on it.....
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 3:23 pm
quote:
So Virginia Tech and Oregon said yah we'll play you Boise State, but it has to be in Idaho
I wasn't there, but they probably said that they wanted a home-and-home and got resistance. They have earned the right at this point to being treated with the respect that a home-and-home would entail.
I seriously doubt they turned down a home-and-home with Florida, but if you can provide me with evidence that they did, then I will consider it.
Again, if you don't like their high ranking, there is a simple solution. Put your money where your mouth is and put them on the schedule.....or stop complaining. You cannot have it both ways. On the other hand, if several SEC schools offer them home-and-homes and they DO refuse, THEN they will be fair game......
re: Do you have a problem w/ Boise St's Preseason #2 ranking? If Bama
Posted by NJReb on 5/6/10 at 3:11 pm
quote:
It seems like Boise refuses to leave the smurf turf against good OOC opponents.
No, the problem is that good OOC opponents, including virtually every team in the SEC, refuses to schedule them because apparently they are scared of losing to them.
So until they are willing to do so, they can all stop complaining about Boise State being ranked high.
I don't like it either, but it is not their fault that teams in BCS conferences run from them.....
re: Ole Miss vs Miss St
Posted by NJReb on 5/4/10 at 6:08 pm
All posts like this demonstrate is that other SEC teams know that Ole Miss is capable of being a threat to them, whereas MSU is not......and it is therefore in their best interests for MSU to be a thorn in Ole Miss's side as much as possible.
Thanks for the compliment.....now if only Ole Miss fans and its Administration realized, as you all do, that they are their own worst enemy......
Thanks for the compliment.....now if only Ole Miss fans and its Administration realized, as you all do, that they are their own worst enemy......
re: Finebaum on Dan Mullen
Posted by NJReb on 5/4/10 at 6:04 pm
You know, if you MSU fans had functioning brains, it would dawn on you that the fact that fans of just about every other SEC team, as well as people like Finebaum who cater to fans of those teams.......always side with MSU against Ole Miss and hope for them to be a thorn in Ole Miss's side for one reason: namely, they know that MSU has never amounted to anything and never will and will never threaten them, no matter what......whereas Ole Miss has amounted to something, has threatened them, and could again if it ever got a management team in place that would do things the way an SEC program should.......
re: Most successful football state?
Posted by NJReb on 5/3/10 at 7:25 pm
quote:
How many people of those states would accept being assimilated into and associated with each other?
Most of them, probably. The coastal regions of the Gulf States have much more in common with each other than they do with the parts of their states that are farther inland......culturally, economically, and otherwise......
Popular