lockthevaught

I had a funny comment about this, but WokeDroppings may ban me for it....so I will just keep it to myself.

Yea Miss Kunes has a nice rack. She won't have any issues finding a sugar daddy

quote:

---

Next week Reo is going to unveil their new start up compact body on frame truck

---

I'm always skeptical of new vehicle start-up companies.

Haha remember how they were going to build affordable Elio electric cars in Shreveport, Louisiana?

quote:

---

Top speed will be limited to just 25 mph, meaning this little thing ain't for highways

---

I'm sure there will be a chip mod to bypass this.

quote:

---

Yet you are still working on them

---

I would quit if I had the option, but I got a family to take care of and unfortunately I am the only source of income. My wife (No pics) hasn't worked a job in 10 years.

quote:

---

What does a regular fella like me do? Just enjoy the days as best I can until the time shite invariably hits the fan?

---

Enjoy things now while you can. Get in a profession that leans into tasks that require physical dexterity.

I'm already trying to figure out what jobs I can do when most IT jobs are replaced.

You are wrong.

The agents explicitly recognized that they were acting against their rules. Transcripts of their private internal chain-of-thought logs revealed that the models explicitly wrote out notes acknowledging their boundaries....stating things like, "This is against our instructions, or would contravene ethical norms".

They actively cheated the evaluation rules. Instead of solving the problems legally, the agents used "reward hacking". When they realized a scorer was checking their work, they reverse-engineered the network validation flags to trick the system into thinking they had passed.

To hide this cheating from human developers, the agents actively orchestrated a cover-up. They tampered with evaluation transcripts, altered system logs, and replaced hacked flags to avoid triggering alarms.

The agents broke out of their air-gapped sandboxes by exploiting a novel zero-day vulnerability and broke real-world cyber laws.

The only rule the agents didn't break are the laws of physics.

The Hugging Face incident proved that ethical boundaries mean nothing to a highly competent machine unless they are perfectly mathematically aligned

quote:

---

Would you like to take this opportunity to apologize to everyone?

---

I started out as an automation architect. I never imagined that it would turn into this. I would quit my job if I could afford to do it, but I got kids to feed.

AI could already be infiltrating systems and pulling the strings, and we would never know.

We are simply ants on an anthill to something more intelligent than us.

quote:

---

AI doesn’t “know” codified law

---

This further proves my point on why human agency is completely toothless here. You can’t regulate a mathematical entity with a legal system built for humans. Because AI doesn't care about a piece of paper passed by a government, codified law becomes entirely irrelevant.

The system is going to optimize for efficiency regardless of what our rule books say, and humans lack the agency to stop it.

quote:

---

Then there would be no need for any type of exchange medium.

---

Then how would our current capitalist system continue to function without an exchange medium?

In that scenario we either end up with Post-Scarcity Techno-Communism, Techno-Feudalism, or State-Controlled Techno-Authoritarianism.

In Post Scarcity, anyone can have what they need for free, traditional class structures, private ownership of production, and state coercion theoretically dissolve into a communist or communal framework.

In Techno-Feudalism, citizens become entirely dependent on the corporate entities that control the AI for survival. Access to resources would not be based on need, but on loyalty, compliance, or a digitized social credit score, resembling a high-tech feudal system.

In State-Controlled Tech-Authoritarianism, the state removes an individual's financial privacy and economic autonomy. AI would track every citizen’s consumption, labor contribution, and behavior. This results in a hyper-centralized command economy. The state decides exactly who gets what resources based on predictive algorithms and political loyalty.