Ex-Popcorn

quote:

---

Insurance with Geico is $120/month

---

Dude, you need more insurance. You've obviously been lucky so far, but it's a ticking time bomb for you--especially in this state

quote:

---

So how do the players get the relief they were granted to make them whole? If they are not eligible, they have no relief and the TRO is meaningless.

---

You are conflating two issues. The relief sought in the lawsuit was to have the 5 for 5 eligibility rule applied retroactively to the class of 2022. That was granted.

Just being in compliance with general NCAA eligibility rules does not mean conferences cannot have more restrictive rules on its VOLUNTARY member institutions. No different than a conference requiring a 3.0gpa to play--which is 1000% permissible.

If a member institution does not want to be subject to conference rules it can give up the money and go the Notre Dame route.

These players are NCAA eligible...they just need to go play for a conference with less restrictive rules.

quote:

---

I don't know that it is in direct defiance of a court order

And...the schools know that at some point, the conference WILL be able to come down on them

Its not worth it over 2-3 players that aren't stars

---

This is why there are procedural rules in litigation. You can't issue relief that impacts the rights of a third party without having that third party involved in the litigation.

If the Plaintiffs' lawyers wanted to bind conferences to the injunctive relief, they would have had to add those conferences as parties to the underlying litigation.

Art. 641. Joinder of parties needed for just adjudication

A person shall be joined as a party in the action when either:

(1) In his absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties.

(2) He claims an interest relating to the subject matter of the action and is so situated that the adjudication of the action in his absence may either:

(a) As a practical matter, impair or impede his ability to protect that interest.

(b) Leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring multiple or inconsistent obligations.

It is not their strength coach. She is a new assistant in the program in the strength and conditioning department. I give prime credit that he likes to give new people experience like this.

To me, the most bang for your buck is still World of Hyatt. You can easily get 5-star resort award nights for 25,000-35,000 points/night. That same class of hotel is close to 100k points per night for marriott.

And, when you book hyatt with reward points, you avoid the $50-90/night "resort fee"

Why would it be limited to just drunk driving? If the principle behind it is that you took someone's life and now you have to pay for their responsibilities, it should apply across the board to any killing that is not justified.

And why just child support? If you cause an accident on the interstate and I miss my flight, you should reimburse me. Let's do that law.

quote:

---

Sadly, no matter how successful you are, whitey will never accept you as an equal. 

---

It's honestly not your fault. You've been raised and nurtured to believe that the white man does everything to keep you under thumb make sure you continue to feel inferior.

It's hard to think critically and challenge these notions when to do so, you would have to recognize and admit that the narrative you've been sold your entire life was a complete lie.

I'm hearing that residential construction is basically shutting down for a bit in Nola/BR due to the ICE sweeps with workers hiding. Anyone seeing this?

quote:

---

I'll run that risk for $1200, especially if its only once per ride.

---

Totally fair. Like I said, it's a big number.

quote:

---

This thought process got us BK.

---

Bingo

quote:

---

He’s in a rebuild year, in year 3? That makes sense
Must really be great recruiting like it’s said.

---

Stop while you're behind. you are getting dragged in this thread by people who understand football.