Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1037
Registered on:11/25/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

The military budget was cut to the bone. Kind of like right now.
You are woefully ingnorant if you really believe this. In 2014, the DOD requested $526.6 billion for its base budget. What did it get?

The U.S. military budget is $612.4 billion for FY 2014. This includes $91.9 billion for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) to pay for the War in Afghanistan, and $520.5 billion to maintain the Department of Defense.

In 2013, the Department of Defense (DoD) base budget was($525.4 billion), which is down from its high of $530.4 billion in FY 2012.

Yeah, really cut to the bone. What a clown.
quote:

Liberal logic at it's best.
Im not a liberal, but Im not a right wing pompom waver like many of you are.
quote:

People in a governors staff coordinated a TRAFFIC JAM... and now its the end of the world because Fox isn't following Traffic Jam 2014!!!
I didnt compare this to Benghazi. Just curious that the right wingers who are afraid of government power, don't carry a story where the government is abusing its power.

Just goes to show that many people on here aren't principled people at all. Their outrage is only apparent when one side does it, but not the other. It s why nothing ever changes.

Your post is a perfect example. Thank you.
quote:

So as a conservative what is your analysis of this?
Saw the MSNBC thread. Just trying to keep the board balanced. Might as well point out the inconsistencies across the media spectrum, instead of acting like this is a unique phenomenon. It helps put some of the faux outrage expressed by some posters in perspective.
Just Saw the MSNBC thread. Just trying to keep the board balanced. Might as well point out the inconsistencies across the media spectrum, instead of acting like this is a unique phenomenon. It helps put some of the faux outrage expressed by some posters in perspective.

Right wingers claim to be afraid of government power, but don't follow a story where the government is abusing its power.

Just goes to show that many people on here aren't principled people at all. Their outrage is only apparent when one side does it, but not the other. It s why nothing ever changes.


How Does Fox Solve a Problem Like Chris Christie’s?

Faced with a scandal involving one of the boss' reportedly favored politicians, Fox found a lot of other news to cover

Follow @TIMECulture

A couple of big news stories broke earlier this week. First, emails and texts implicated top aides and allies of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie in snarling traffic in a small town to punish its mayor for not endorsing Christie’s reelection. Second, details began leaking from an upcoming book by Gabriel Sherman about Fox News boss Roger Ailes—among them, that Ailes had tried to persuade Christie to run for president in 2012.

Ailes still runs Fox News. And Christie is by every indication considering running for president in 2016. So how is Fox to cover the scandal gathering around him?

On Wednesday, the scandal gathering around an early frontrunner for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination dominated newspaper headlines, politics news sites, and TV news. Except on Fox, whose programs covered the story relatively little or not at all (Although, according to Buzzfeed, Fox covered the story for eight minutes more than Al Jazeera America.) The scandal was not at all mentioned by prime-time talkers Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity, and took a back seat to other stories on Greta Van Susteren’s and Megyn Kelly’s shows.

By Thursday, Fox was giving the story considerably more airtime, but not to the degree that CNN and MSNBC did. It led its 9 a.m. news block with the story, for instance, but soon turned to stories about two Obama administration scandals, the IRS audit and HealthCare.gov investigations (the IRS, in particular, came up repeatedly in Fox News discussions of the bridge scandal ). And as Christie gave a marathon, almost-two-hour apology news conference, Fox News was the first cable-news network to cut away, just over an hour in. It gave a few minutes to political analysis—at one point, an anchor almost apologetically explained that the network needed to cover the story because of Christie’s political profile—then moved on to other news.

Gauging the motivating factors in Fox’s coverage of a Christie scandal is a bit of a bank shot, given the internecine politics of the conservative base to which Fox appeals. On the one hand, it’s not just liberals who are happy to see Christie twist in the wind; plenty of conservative Republicans see him as too moderate or, in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, too tight with President Barack Obama. On the other hand, he’s not just a leading prospective candidate but a favorite of many establishment Republicans—like Ailes.



quote:

Funny how Dem congresses get a pass on these collapses. It's almost like the Prez is a king or something.
They don't. You didn't read my following sentence. "I think the reasons why are debatable"
quote:

I'm still trying to figure how how you right wing loons can delude yourselves into thinking Republicans are good for the economy when the three greatest collapses of financial institutions occurred under Republican presidents.
This. Its not debatable that these collapses occurred under Republican presidents. I think the reasons why are debatable. However, the right doesn't like to spend time discssing this. It would be a good thread topic.
quote:

I remember Iraq as the place where Syria got their chemical weapons.
BS. Syrias; chemical weapons program was the most robust in the middle east. They spent decades developing it. They were the leader on this issue. After Osirik in 1981, they decided this would be a safer route to develop WMD. Obviously, because of what happened in 2007, they changed their mind along the way.
quote:

Jbird
Do you remember that Michael Moore documentary on Bush? The left discussed that thing like it was gospel.
quote:

Your ignorant insinuation is that Bush halted that operation, which is patently false and completely wrong.
No but Obama greatly expanded it and reemphasized its importance.

The common theme in many of these posts is to assign blame to Obama for things that happened under his watch, but not to give any credit for things that happened under is watch. Classic selective bias.

You're being kind of hard on posters here Rex. Political propaganda exist for a reason-its effective. It appeals to the simple minded. Just look at Obamas "Yes we can" slogan. People ate that shite up.


quote:

I'll leave it to others to demolish your conclusory statements that you present with no supporting analysis.
Im just listing facts. Obviously, anyone can post their opinion.

Syria is giving up its chemical weapons without a shot fired.

His sanctions program against Iran brought them to the negotiating table-without a shot fired.

Ended our occupation of Iraq, and is reducing worldwide military footprint.

Got Bin Laden-something his predecessor failed to do.

His Republican Secretary of Defense wrote that "He thought Obama was absolutely right in every one of his decisions regarding Afghanistan." That's quite a statement.

Helped the country recover from the 2008 recession-stock market is vastly higher than when he took office, housing market is better than when he took office, unemployment is much lower than when he took office.

Failures:

The Obamacare rollout was a complete disaster. He spent all this political capital on the law, and then completely fumbled it. He lied to the public about Obamacare "you can keep your plan"-not true-and so far it is not reducing healthcare costs-something he also said would happen.

The economic recovery has been the slowest in history. 6 years after 2008, and the economy is still wobbly.
quote:

Very thoughtful and IMHO completely accurate.
How so? Obamas foreign policy is much better than what we have had in a long time. The economy is much improved since 2008.
Yes and that would be accurate.

At the same point in Bush's presidency, the 43rd president had spent 367 days at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, and his parent's compound at Kennebunkport, Maine, according to a count by CBS News reporter Mark Knoller. Obama, who doesn't own a vacation home, has spent a total of 92 days of his presidency on vacation, according to Knoller.


The tradition of criticizing presidents for the choice of vacation spots and duration of their holiday is as old as the Republic itself.
Another blatant attempt to repair his image. I hate political propaganda. Only the weak minded fall for it.
quote:

Thus far obama has played more than four times the number of rounds that Bush played in eight years.
Vacations bruh. Bush racked up more than anyone else, and still owns that record.
quote:

Taken more vacations and played more golf than any president
Bush still owns this record. Will be a tough one to beat.
quote:

Can you possibly be serious?
The numbers from the bureau of labor and statistics say that I am correct.

quote:

You think the red line fiasco was a diplomatic success for the US?
Absolutely. Syria spent decades building the largest stockpile of chemical weapons in the ME. The mere threat of attacks from Obama got them to give them up, and cost us no US lives.

re: 1/2 Questions/Revisit

Posted by sammyptiger on 1/25/14 at 9:23 am
quote:

That may have happened but as time goes on I'm become less and less sympathetic to the staff's plight on the matter. LSU shouldn't put themselves in a situation to where they can be "screwed over."
No offense man, but your post is just ignorant. 5 star recruits have far too many suitors to just tell them to take it or leave it. The guys we are in the hunt for will make up for what we didn't land, precisely because LSU put time recruiting other guys at their position.
Syria is giving up its chemical weapons without a shot fired.

His sanctions program against Iran brought them to the negotiating table-without a shot fired.

Ended our occupation of Iraq, and is reducing worldwide military footprint.

Got Bin Laden-something his predecessor failed to do.

His Republican Secretary of Defense wrote that "He thought Obama was absolutely right in every one of his decisions regarding Afghanistan." That's quite a statement.

Helped the country recover from the 2008 recession-stock market is vastly higher than when he took office, housing market is better than when he took office, unemployment is much lower than when he took office.

Failures:

The Obamacare rollout was a complete disaster. He spent all this political capital on the law, and then completely fumbled it. He lied to the public about Obamacare "you can keep your plan"-not true-and so far it is not reducing healthcare costs-something he also said would happen.

The economic recovery has been the slowest in history. 6 years after 2008, and the economy is still wobbly.